Re: [QUESTIONS] Snapshot has not compiled in a couple of days
Is anyone aware that the last 2 or 3 days of snapshots will not
compile?The problem is in the ecpq stuff. There is a duplicate def of S_SIGNED.
Cab we fix this, so I can test the compile on HPUX?
My cvs tree from 980223 03:00 UTC (about 24 hours ago) compiled to completion, but
I do see a duplicate definition of S_SIGNED in preproc.y. Remove that symbol from
line 234 of that file and try again.
- Tom
Import Notes
Reference msg id not found: 199802241736.MAA12051@hub.org
The problem is in the ecpq stuff. There is a duplicate def of S_SIGNED.
Cab we fix this, so I can test the compile on HPUX?My cvs tree from 980223 03:00 UTC (about 24 hours ago) compiled to completion, but
I do see a duplicate definition of S_SIGNED in preproc.y. Remove that symbol from
line 234 of that file and try again.
/usr/bin/bison -y -d preproc.y
conflicts: 5 shift/reduce
gcc -I../include -O2 -g -Wall -DMAJOR_VERSION=1 -DMINOR_VERSION=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -c
y.tab.c -o y.tab.o
...
preproc.y:289: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target
type
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o ecpg y.tab.o pgc.o type.o ecpg.o ../lib/typename.o
I removed the duplicate S_SIGNED from my source code and noticed these remaining
messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I haven't looked at the code,
but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison ("-v") which will write a log file
identifying the conflicting statements. I have some experience debugging this on the
main parser, but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :(
- Tom
Import Notes
Reference msg id not found: 199802241736.MAA12051@hub.org
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
The problem is in the ecpq stuff. There is a duplicate def of S_SIGNED.
Cab we fix this, so I can test the compile on HPUX?My cvs tree from 980223 03:00 UTC (about 24 hours ago) compiled to completion, but
I do see a duplicate definition of S_SIGNED in preproc.y. Remove that symbol from
line 234 of that file and try again./usr/bin/bison -y -d preproc.y
conflicts: 5 shift/reduce
gcc -I../include -O2 -g -Wall -DMAJOR_VERSION=1 -DMINOR_VERSION=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -c
y.tab.c -o y.tab.o
...
preproc.y:289: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target
type
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o ecpg y.tab.o pgc.o type.o ecpg.o ../lib/typename.oI removed the duplicate S_SIGNED from my source code and noticed these
remaining messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I
haven't looked at the code, but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison
("-v") which will write a log file identifying the conflicting
statements. I have some experience debugging this on the main parser,
but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :(
If I can figure out bison, I'll try and work these out...one way
to learn, I guess :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
remaining messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I
haven't looked at the code, but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison
("-v") which will write a log file identifying the conflicting
statements. I have some experience debugging this on the main parser,
but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :(If I can figure out bison, I'll try and work these out...one way
to learn, I guess :)
This ecps is hot, but it seems it is still 'in process' as we approach
release date. Can we do what we did with pgaccess, and get a web site
that has the most recent version, and just ship a current version with
6.3, and people can go to the web site to get the newest copy? We put a
nice README in the pgaccess directory pointing people to a web site
having the most recent version. Seemed to work well.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
remaining messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I
haven't looked at the code, but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison
("-v") which will write a log file identifying the conflicting
statements. I have some experience debugging this on the main parser,
but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :(If I can figure out bison, I'll try and work these out...one way
to learn, I guess :)This ecps is hot, but it seems it is still 'in process' as we approach
release date. Can we do what we did with pgaccess, and get a web site
that has the most recent version, and just ship a current version with
6.3, and people can go to the web site to get the newest copy? We put a
nice README in the pgaccess directory pointing people to a web site
having the most recent version. Seemed to work well.
ecpg isn't a seperate package, so this isn't really an alternative
in this case :(
The above problem is more an annoyance then anything, and, quite
frankly, I don't understand enough about yacc/bison to work out where.
Well, I understand more now then when I started, but still have a long way
to go. Next Nutshell book, I fear :)
I'm going to do a run through of the code again tomorrow at work,
on the two Solaris boxes, and check for compiler problems...
Jan, how goes the pg_shadow stuff? I believe we still have
breakage in initdb, but Bruce is waiting for that patch before
investigating further?
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
Thomas G. Lockhart writes:
/usr/bin/bison -y -d preproc.y
conflicts: 5 shift/reduce
gcc -I../include -O2 -g -Wall -DMAJOR_VERSION=1 -DMINOR_VERSION=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -c
y.tab.c -o y.tab.o
...
preproc.y:289: warning: passing arg 1 of `free' discards `const' from pointer target
type
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o ecpg y.tab.o pgc.o type.o ecpg.o ../lib/typename.oI removed the duplicate S_SIGNED from my source code and noticed these remaining
messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I haven't looked at the code,
but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison ("-v") which will write a log file
identifying the conflicting statements. I have some experience debugging this on the
main parser, but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :(
I see what I can do. Unfortunately I'm not really a bison expert either.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10