weird comments in Memoize nodes

Started by Peter Eisentrautover 3 years ago3 messages
#1Peter Eisentraut
peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com

Consider:

typedef struct Memoize
{
Plan plan;

int numKeys; /* size of the two arrays below */

Oid *hashOperators; /* hash operators for each key */
Oid *collations; /* cache keys */
List *param_exprs; /* exprs containing parameters */
...

I think the comment "cache keys" is weird here. Maybe it was copied from

typedef struct MemoizePath
{
Path path;
Path *subpath; /* outerpath to cache tuples from */
List *hash_operators; /* hash operators for each key */
List *param_exprs; /* cache keys */
...

but it's attached to a different field there.

Is this a mistake, or could this be clarified?

#2David Rowley
dgrowleyml@gmail.com
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#1)
1 attachment(s)
Re: weird comments in Memoize nodes

On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 04:21, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Oid *collations; /* cache keys */

Is this a mistake, or could this be clarified?

Yeah, must be a copy-pasto. I'll fix it with the attached after beta1
is tagged.

David

Attachments:

fix_memoize_comments.patchtext/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name=fix_memoize_comments.patchDownload
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h b/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h
index e319e83bd8..0ea9a22dfb 100644
--- a/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h
@@ -824,8 +824,9 @@ typedef struct Memoize
 	int			numKeys;		/* size of the two arrays below */
 
 	Oid		   *hashOperators;	/* hash operators for each key */
-	Oid		   *collations;		/* cache keys */
-	List	   *param_exprs;	/* exprs containing parameters */
+	Oid		   *collations;		/* collations for each key */
+	List	   *param_exprs;	/* cache keys in the form of exprs containing
+								 * parameters */
 	bool		singlerow;		/* true if the cache entry should be marked as
 								 * complete after we store the first tuple in
 								 * it. */
#3David Rowley
dgrowleyml@gmail.com
In reply to: David Rowley (#2)
Re: weird comments in Memoize nodes

On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 08:02, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, must be a copy-pasto. I'll fix it with the attached after beta1
is tagged.

Pushed.

David