Remove redundant code in pl_exec.c
Hi, hackers
I found there are some redundant code in pl_exec.c,
plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro is same as plpgsql_param_eval_generic
except it invokes MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.
IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.
Is there something I missed? Any thoughts?
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
Attachments:
code-cleanup-for-plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro.patchtext/x-patchDownload+1-28
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
I found there are some redundant code in pl_exec.c,
plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro is same as plpgsql_param_eval_generic
except it invokes MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.
Which is exactly why it's NOT redundant.
IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.
I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 at 23:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.
Sorry, I don't get your mind. Could you explain it more? Thanks in advance!
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 at 23:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.
Sorry, I don't get your mind. Could you explain it more? Thanks in advance!
This refactoring cannot support the situation where there is more
code to execute after MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.
regards, tom lane