Remove redundant code in pl_exec.c

Started by Japin Liover 3 years ago4 messages
#1Japin Li
japinli@hotmail.com
1 attachment(s)

Hi, hackers

I found there are some redundant code in pl_exec.c,
plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro is same as plpgsql_param_eval_generic
except it invokes MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.

IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.

Is there something I missed? Any thoughts?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

Attachments:

code-cleanup-for-plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro.patchtext/x-patchDownload
diff --git a/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c b/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c
index 7bd2a9fff1..543419d3da 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c
+++ b/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c
@@ -6673,34 +6673,7 @@ static void
 plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro(ExprState *state, ExprEvalStep *op,
 							  ExprContext *econtext)
 {
-	ParamListInfo params;
-	PLpgSQL_execstate *estate;
-	int			dno = op->d.cparam.paramid - 1;
-	PLpgSQL_datum *datum;
-	Oid			datumtype;
-	int32		datumtypmod;
-
-	/* fetch back the hook data */
-	params = econtext->ecxt_param_list_info;
-	estate = (PLpgSQL_execstate *) params->paramFetchArg;
-	Assert(dno >= 0 && dno < estate->ndatums);
-
-	/* now we can access the target datum */
-	datum = estate->datums[dno];
-
-	/* fetch datum's value */
-	exec_eval_datum(estate, datum,
-					&datumtype, &datumtypmod,
-					op->resvalue, op->resnull);
-
-	/* safety check -- needed for, eg, record fields */
-	if (unlikely(datumtype != op->d.cparam.paramtype))
-		ereport(ERROR,
-				(errcode(ERRCODE_DATATYPE_MISMATCH),
-				 errmsg("type of parameter %d (%s) does not match that when preparing the plan (%s)",
-						op->d.cparam.paramid,
-						format_type_be(datumtype),
-						format_type_be(op->d.cparam.paramtype))));
+	plpgsql_param_eval_generic(state, op, econtext);
 
 	/* force the value to read-only */
 	*op->resvalue = MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly(*op->resvalue,
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Japin Li (#1)
Re: Remove redundant code in pl_exec.c

Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:

I found there are some redundant code in pl_exec.c,
plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro is same as plpgsql_param_eval_generic
except it invokes MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.

Which is exactly why it's NOT redundant.

IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.

I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.

regards, tom lane

#3Japin Li
japinli@hotmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: Remove redundant code in pl_exec.c

On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 at 23:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:

IMO, we can invoke plpgsql_param_eval_generic in plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro
to avoid the redundant.

I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.

Sorry, I don't get your mind. Could you explain it more? Thanks in advance!

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

#4Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Japin Li (#3)
Re: Remove redundant code in pl_exec.c

Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:

On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 at 23:34, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
we'd have a mess.

Sorry, I don't get your mind. Could you explain it more? Thanks in advance!

This refactoring cannot support the situation where there is more
code to execute after MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.

regards, tom lane