Some deleted GUCs are still referred to
Hi,
I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and
"max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files
(from the REL_16_1 source zip)
src\backend\po\fr.po
src\backend\po\tr.po
~~
Should those be removed?
There was a commit [1]https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/15c121b3ed7eb2f290e19533e41ccca734d23574#diff-65c699b5d467081e780d255ea0ed7d720b5bca2427e300f9fd0776bffe51560a that said these all traces of those GUCs had
been eliminated.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and
"max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files
(from the REL_16_1 source zip)src\backend\po\fr.po
src\backend\po\tr.po~~
Should those be removed?
These mentions are only in comments and not in actual translations, so I don't
think they risk causing any issues.
$ git grep max_fsm_ |cut -d":" -f 2 |grep -v "^#" | wc -l
0
I don't know enough about the translation workflow to know how these comments
are handled, sending this to pgsql-translators@ might be a better way to reach
the authors working on this.
There was a commit [1] that said these all traces of those GUCs had
been eliminated.
Translations are managed in an external repo and synced with the main repo at
intervals, so such a commit couldn't have updated the master translation work
files anyways.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and
"max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files
(from the REL_16_1 source zip)src\backend\po\fr.po
src\backend\po\tr.po~~
Should those be removed?
These mentions are only in comments and not in actual translations, so I don't
think they risk causing any issues.$ git grep max_fsm_ |cut -d":" -f 2 |grep -v "^#" | wc -l
0I don't know enough about the translation workflow to know how these comments
are handled, sending this to pgsql-translators@ might be a better way to reach
the authors working on this.
Thanks for the advice. Done that.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
FYI.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and
"max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files
(from the REL_16_1 source zip)src\backend\po\fr.po
src\backend\po\tr.po~~
Should those be removed?
These mentions are only in comments and not in actual translations, so I don't
think they risk causing any issues.
$ git grep max_fsm_ |cut -d":" -f 2 |grep -v "^#" | wc -l
0
I don't know enough about the translation workflow to know how these comments
are handled, sending this to pgsql-translators@ might be a better way to reach
the authors working on this.
There was a commit [1] that said these all traces of those GUCs had
been eliminated.
Translations are managed in an external repo and synced with the main repo at
intervals, so such a commit couldn't have updated the master translation work
files anyways.
--
Daniel Gustafsson