Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!
Started by Zeugswetter Andreas SBabout 25 years ago3 messages
This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ?
Andreas
*** ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c.orig Wed Nov 1 10:00:22 2000
--- ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c Tue Nov 7 11:07:28 2000
***************
*** 1212,1218 ****
is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0;
if (!is_match)
break;
! // Move on to the next byte
p++;
if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) {
mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is);
--- 1212,1218 ----
is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0;
if (!is_match)
break;
! /* Move on to the next byte */
p++;
if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) {
mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is);
Re: Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!
Applied.
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ?
Andreas
*** ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c.orig Wed Nov 1 10:00:22 2000 --- ./src/backend/utils/adt/varbit.c Tue Nov 7 11:07:28 2000 *************** *** 1212,1218 **** is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0; if (!is_match) break; ! // Move on to the next byte p++; if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) { mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is); --- 1212,1218 ---- is_match = ((cmp ^ *p) & mask1) == 0; if (!is_match) break; ! /* Move on to the next byte */ p++; if (p == VARBITEND(arg)) { mask2 = end_mask << (BITS_PER_BYTE - is);
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Re: Again please no // comments !!!!!!!!
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes:
This somehow gets moot. Is there a way to make gcc reject those comments ?
It looks like -ansi would cause gcc to reject // comments, but -ansi has
enough not-so-desirable side effects that I would vote against making
that switch part of our standard switch set for gcc.
I think we should continue to rely on our faithful community of testers
to find portability glitches like this one ;-)
regards, tom lane