add some errhint for regexp* functions.

Started by jian he10 months ago2 messageshackers
Beta feature

Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.

appliessuccessCI history

You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:

docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t52848
psql -h localhost -U postgres

Built from patchset v1 (message #1), September 20, 2026 at 02:16 AM.

Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:

git clone --branch t52848_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

In a checkout you already have, add the fork once:

git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

then, for this patchset and every later one:

git fetch hackorum t52848_1 && git checkout t52848_1

Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t52848_1

Jump to latest
#1jian he
jian.universality@gmail.com

hi.

Some of the regexp* function error messages seem not very helpful, I think.
like:
ereport(ERROR,
errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("invalid value for parameter \"%s\": %d",
"start", start));

so I added a errhint, errhint would be better than refactoring existing errmsg.
for the above example, I've add:

+ errhint("\"%s\" must be an integer value greater than zero", "start")));

--
jian
https://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachments:

t52848_1
v1-0001-regex-function-add-errhint.patchtext/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name=v1-0001-regex-function-add-errhint.patchDownload+36-14
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: jian he (#1)
Re: add some errhint for regexp* functions.

jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> writes:

Some of the regexp* function error messages seem not very helpful, I think.
like:
ereport(ERROR,
errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("invalid value for parameter \"%s\": %d",
"start", start));

so I added a errhint, errhint would be better than refactoring existing errmsg.
for the above example, I've add:

+ errhint("\"%s\" must be an integer value greater than zero", "start")));

There are probably hundreds of other places where the ereport
doesn't provide such detail, and I don't see that this adds
much. If you don't understand why a negative value isn't OK,
you still need to go RTFM.

(This message doesn't follow our style guidelines, either.)

regards, tom lane