locking bug?

Started by Max Khonabout 25 years ago2 messages
#1Max Khon
fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru

hi, there!

test=> create table foo(id int primary key);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'foo_pkey'
for table 'foo'
CREATE
test=> insert into foo values(1);
INSERT 88959 1
test=> create table bar(id int references foo);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY
check(s)
CREATE
test=> begin;
BEGIN
test=> insert into bar values(1);
INSERT 88976 1
test=>

after that (we did not issued commit or rollback on the connection)
in another psql:

test=> begin;
BEGIN
test=> insert into bar values(1);
...and this transaction locks up until we finish first transaction

if we insert different values no locking occur.
this happens on both postgresql 7.03 and 7.1-beta1

/fjoe

#2Stephan Szabo
sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com
In reply to: Max Khon (#1)
Re: locking bug?

This is because the first transaction has a lock on the
row in foo due to the references constrain, it currently
grabs the lock to prevent the pk row from being
removed after we tested its existance but before the transaction
closed. There's been talk about using some kind of dirty reads to drop
the need for the lock, but that hasn't been done yet.

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Max Khon wrote:

Show quoted text

hi, there!

test=> create table foo(id int primary key);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'foo_pkey'
for table 'foo'
CREATE
test=> insert into foo values(1);
INSERT 88959 1
test=> create table bar(id int references foo);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY
check(s)
CREATE
test=> begin;
BEGIN
test=> insert into bar values(1);
INSERT 88976 1
test=>

after that (we did not issued commit or rollback on the connection)
in another psql:

test=> begin;
BEGIN
test=> insert into bar values(1);
...and this transaction locks up until we finish first transaction

if we insert different values no locking occur.
this happens on both postgresql 7.03 and 7.1-beta1

/fjoe