UNDER?

Is UNDER being stripped out for 7.1? I'm looking at documentation and don't
want to write about it if it won't be in there.

Already gone. Check the recent archives for the discussion...

- Thomas

"Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com> writes:

Is UNDER being stripped out for 7.1?

It's history.

regards, tom lane

"Robert B. Easter" wrote:

Is UNDER being stripped out for 7.1? I'm looking at documentation and don't
want to write about it if it won't be in there.

Thats' how I understand the outcome of a discussion about 1 week ago
here:

Tom Lane wrote on Tue Jan 2 20:19:18 2001:

Anyway, we seem to have a clear consensus to pull the UNDER clause from
the grammar and stick with INHERITS for 7.1. I will take care of that
in the next day or so.

------------------
Hannu