contrib

Started by m walmost 25 years ago6 messages
#1m w
mttf2000@yahoo.com

Is there a formal way of submiting something to the
contrib section of the distribution?

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

#2Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: m w (#1)
Re: contrib

Is there a formal way of submiting something to the
contrib section of the distribution?

Not really. Just throw it over to patches, and we will check it out.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#3Joe Conway
joe@conway-family.com
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
1 attachment(s)
Re: [HACKERS] contrib

Is there a formal way of submiting something to the
contrib section of the distribution?

Not really. Just throw it over to patches, and we will check it out.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us

While thinking about how to implement TABLE_PRIVILEGES view per SQL92, I
realized that a function is needed to dynamically return the current
database name, and current database owner. I also remembered that I have
needed the first function before and could not find anything. Attached is a
group of 4 functions, suitable (I think) for contrib, as follows:

current_dbname() - returns name of current database
current_dboid() - retuns oid of current database
current_dbownername() - returns owner name of current database (based on
datdba)
current_dbownerid() - returns owner usesysid (well, more accurately datdba)

Installation:
copy to contrib
tar -xzvf current_db.tgz
cd current_db
./install.sh (or alternatively make; make install; psql -U postgres
your_db_name < current_db.sql)

I'd like to have this considered for inclusion in contrib if deemed useful
to others. Is there anything specific I need to do to in addition to the
attached?

Thanks,

-- Joe

Attachments:

current_db.tgzapplication/x-compressed; name=current_db.tgzDownload
#4Justin Clift
justin@postgresql.org
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib

Wouldn't this be better as part of PostgreSQL's standard functions,
instead of being in contrib?

Feels like this kind of function is useful "for everyone".

???

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Joe Conway wrote:

Show quoted text

Is there a formal way of submiting something to the
contrib section of the distribution?

Not really. Just throw it over to patches, and we will check it out.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us

While thinking about how to implement TABLE_PRIVILEGES view per SQL92, I
realized that a function is needed to dynamically return the current
database name, and current database owner. I also remembered that I have
needed the first function before and could not find anything. Attached is a
group of 4 functions, suitable (I think) for contrib, as follows:

current_dbname() - returns name of current database
current_dboid() - retuns oid of current database
current_dbownername() - returns owner name of current database (based on
datdba)
current_dbownerid() - returns owner usesysid (well, more accurately datdba)

Installation:
copy to contrib
tar -xzvf current_db.tgz
cd current_db
./install.sh (or alternatively make; make install; psql -U postgres
your_db_name < current_db.sql)

I'd like to have this considered for inclusion in contrib if deemed useful
to others. Is there anything specific I need to do to in addition to the
attached?

Thanks,

-- Joe

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: current_db.tgz
current_db.tgz Type: application/x-compressed
Encoding: base64

------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

#5Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Joe Conway (#3)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib

"Joe Conway" <joe@conway-family.com> writes:

While thinking about how to implement TABLE_PRIVILEGES view per SQL92, I
realized that a function is needed to dynamically return the current
database name, and current database owner.

Just out of curiosity, why are these needed for TABLE_PRIVILEGES?

current_dbname() - returns name of current database
current_dboid() - retuns oid of current database
current_dbownername() - returns owner name of current database (based on
datdba)
current_dbownerid() - returns owner usesysid (well, more accurately datdba)

One thing to bear in mind is that the existing notion of databases
may need to be rethought when we implement SQL-style schemas (which
I hope will happen for 7.2). It might be best to refrain from inventing
more functions until we see how the schema work settles out.

I haven't yet heard any serious discussion about how to integrate
the SQL-defined schema concepts with Postgres' traditional concept of
independent databases within an installation. It's about time to have
that discussion though ...

regards, tom lane

#6Joe Conway
joe@conway-family.com
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib

Just out of curiosity, why are these needed for TABLE_PRIVILEGES?

Only one is really needed for that purpose, current_dbname. TABLE_PRIVILEGES
defines the field TABLE_CATALOG which should be set to the current database
name. In MSSQL7 you can get the current database using a function called
DB_NAME(). In Oracle, you can get it by querying for NAME from V_$DATABASE.

-- Joe