PL/PgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS command
I see the new PL/PgSQL command:
GET DIAGNOSTICS
This seems like a poorly-worded command to me. It is meant to return
the number of rows affected by a previous query, right?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:04:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I see the new PL/PgSQL command:
GET DIAGNOSTICS
This seems like a poorly-worded command to me. It is meant to return
the number of rows affected by a previous query, right?
Among other things, eventually. You get to blame the SQL standards
committee, again:
wallace$ grep 'GET DIAGNOSTICS' sql1992.txt
GET DIAGNOSTICS <sql diagnostics information>
Ross
Bruce Momjian writes:
I see the new PL/PgSQL command:
GET DIAGNOSTICS
This seems like a poorly-worded command to me. It is meant to return
the number of rows affected by a previous query, right?
That's how SQL wants it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:04:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I see the new PL/PgSQL command:
GET DIAGNOSTICS
This seems like a poorly-worded command to me. It is meant to return
the number of rows affected by a previous query, right?Among other things, eventually. You get to blame the SQL standards
committee, again:wallace$ grep 'GET DIAGNOSTICS' sql1992.txt
GET DIAGNOSTICS <sql diagnostics information>
That is unbelievable! (But true.)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026