Strange behaviour of to_date()

Started by Mario Weilguniover 24 years ago3 messages
#1Mario Weilguni
mweilguni@sime.com

I noticed a quite strange behaviour of to_char() in 7.0 and 7.1. It treats
abbreveated forms of a date completely wrong. Example:

-- this one is ok
mario=# select to_date('04.01.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04

-- this is completly wrong, but NO error raised
mario=# select to_date('4.01.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
0001-01-04

-- completly wrong as well
mario=# select to_date('4.1.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
0001-01-04

IMO to_date() should either recognize the date, even if shorter than the mask
(Oracle compatible), or raise an error. Currently it gives completly wrong
results, which is the worst option.

I tried to fix this myself, but I'm lost within backend/utils/adt/formatting.c

--
===================================================
Mario Weilguni � � � � � � � � KPNQwest Austria GmbH
�Senior Engineer Web Solutions Nikolaiplatz 4
�tel: +43-316-813824 � � � � 8020 graz, austria
�fax: +43-316-813824-26 � � � http://www.kpnqwest.at
�e-mail: mario.weilguni@kpnqwest.com
===================================================

#2Karel Zak
zakkr@zf.jcu.cz
In reply to: Mario Weilguni (#1)
Re: Strange behaviour of to_date()

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 07:46:19PM +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote:

I noticed a quite strange behaviour of to_char() in 7.0 and 7.1. It treats
abbreveated forms of a date completely wrong. Example:

-- this one is ok
mario=# select to_date('04.01.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04

-- this is completly wrong, but NO error raised
mario=# select to_date('4.01.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
0001-01-04

-- completly wrong as well
mario=# select to_date('4.1.2001', 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
0001-01-04

Really bug? What you obtain from 'dd.mm.yyyy' in to_char()

test=# select to_char('04.01.2001'::date, 'dd.mm.yyyy');
to_char
------------
04.01.2001
(1 row)

'04.01.2001' and '4.1.2001' are *different* strings with *different*
format masks....

See (and read docs):

test=# select to_char('04.01.2001'::date, 'FMdd.FMmm.yyyy');
to_char
----------
4.1.2001
(1 row)

test=# select to_date('4.1.2001', 'FMdd.FMmm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04
(1 row)

Yes, Oracle support using not exact format mask, but Oracle's to_date
is very based on date/time and not support others things:

SVRMGR> select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy') from
dual;
TO_DATE('
---------
ORA-01821: date format not recognized

test=# select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04
(1 row)

or nice:

test=# select to_date('33304333.1.2001', '333dd333.FMmm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04
(1 row)

And primarily Oracle's to_date() is designed for operation that in
PG is solved via timestamp/date cast. For example you can use in
Oracle to_date('4.1.2001') without format mask and it's same thing
as 4.1.2001::date cast('4.1.2001' as date) in PG.

The to_char()/to_date() works as say docs :-)

Better support for not exact masks is in my TODO fo 7.2.

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

#3Mario Weilguni
Mario.Weilguni@kpnqwest.com
In reply to: Karel Zak (#2)
Re: Strange behaviour of to_date()

Am Mittwoch, 18. April 2001 10:47 schrieben Sie:
(...)

Yes, Oracle support using not exact format mask, but Oracle's to_date
is very based on date/time and not support others things:

SVRMGR> select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy') from
dual;
TO_DATE('
---------
ORA-01821: date format not recognized

test=# select to_date('333.222.4.1.2001', '333.222.FMdd.FMmm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04
(1 row)

or nice:

test=# select to_date('33304333.1.2001', '333dd333.FMmm.yyyy');
to_date
------------
2001-01-04
(1 row)

Maybe it's not designed for my needs, but that does not change the fact that
it's a bug. When the mask is not exact, it should raise an error, and not
silently return WRONG values, which is really bad behaviour, and will result
in "lost" data.

--
===================================================
Mario Weilguni � � � � � � � � KPNQwest Austria GmbH
�Senior Engineer Web Solutions Nikolaiplatz 4
�tel: +43-316-813824 � � � � 8020 graz, austria
�fax: +43-316-813824-26 � � � http://www.kpnqwest.at
�e-mail: mario.weilguni@kpnqwest.com
===================================================