row name length

Adam Rose writes:

I noticed in the documentation that row length is unlimited. I think I
took that to mean row name length is now unlimited. But, row

You took that wrong...

name length still appears to be set to a static width. Do I still need to
recompile postgres to get 64 character row headers?

Yes.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

Thanks for you help

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Adam Rose writes:

I noticed in the documentation that row length is unlimited. I think I
took that to mean row name length is now unlimited. But, row

You took that wrong...

name length still appears to be set to a static width. Do I still need to
recompile postgres to get 64 character row headers?

Yes.

--
Adam Rose

Just a question, where is NAMEDATALEN now in 7.1, I didn't see it in
postgres.h. If this is no longer used to change column name length, what
is? Your help is appreciated.

-
Adam Rose

Is anyone else seeing this?

I have the current CVS sources and "make check" ends up with one
failure. My regression.diffs shows:

*** ./expected/join.out Thu Dec 14 17:30:45 2000
--- ./results/join.out  Mon Apr 23 20:23:15 2001
***************
*** 1845,1851 ****
  -- UNION JOIN isn't implemented yet
  SELECT '' AS "xxx", *
    FROM J1_TBL UNION JOIN J2_TBL;
! ERROR:  UNION JOIN is not implemented yet
  --
  -- Clean up
  --
--- 1845,1851 ----
  -- UNION JOIN isn't implemented yet
  SELECT '' AS "xxx", *
    FROM J1_TBL UNION JOIN J2_TBL;
! ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "JOIN"
  --
  -- Clean up
  --

======================================================================

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9

Please disregard this. This message was held by Majordomo for a couple
of days and I have already resent it.

Tom Lane has already solved my problem (I had a miscompiled version of
bison in my machine).

Regards to all,
Fernando

Fernando Nasser wrote:

Is anyone else seeing this?

I have the current CVS sources and "make check" ends up with one
failure. My regression.diffs shows:

*** ./expected/join.out Thu Dec 14 17:30:45 2000
--- ./results/join.out  Mon Apr 23 20:23:15 2001
***************
*** 1845,1851 ****
-- UNION JOIN isn't implemented yet
SELECT '' AS "xxx", *
FROM J1_TBL UNION JOIN J2_TBL;
! ERROR:  UNION JOIN is not implemented yet
--
-- Clean up
--
--- 1845,1851 ----
-- UNION JOIN isn't implemented yet
SELECT '' AS "xxx", *
FROM J1_TBL UNION JOIN J2_TBL;
! ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "JOIN"
--
-- Clean up
--

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Inc. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com