pl/pgsql list

Bob <luckyratfoot@gmail.com> writes:

What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems
pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make sense,
and if it did can we have a separate list?

I don't think it makes sense--it's not like traffic related to
pl/pgsql floods out everything else on the list. For better or worse,
it's an integral part of PG--what's the rationale for a separate list?

-Doug

luckyratfoot@gmail.com (Bob) writes:

What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql?� Seems
pl/pgsql deserves her own area.�Just wondering if this would make
sense, and if it did can we have a separate list?

I haven't been seeing so much traffic about pl/pgsql that it seems to
warrant a separate list.

If we were having to turn away pl/pgsql questions, I would easily
agree.
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/&gt;

My thought is on it's own pl/pgsql is just as important as straight SQL.
Maybe as time goes on we will see higher volumes of pl/pgsql questions, if
that is what warrants a separate list. I personally don't see why one would
put pl/pgsql in with everything else. Maybe because I come from an Oracle
world where volumes of books have been written on PL/SQL on it's own.
Bob

Bob <luckyratfoot@gmail.com> writes:

My thought is on it's own pl/pgsql is just as important as straight SQL.
Maybe as time goes on we will see higher volumes of pl/pgsql questions, if
that is what warrants a separate list. I personally don't see why one
would put pl/pgsql in with everything else. Maybe because I come from an
Oracle world where volumes of books have been written on PL/SQL on it's
own.

When the list traffic demands it, perhaps it'll be considered. Until
then there's no reason to multiply lists beyond necessity. Even Tom
Lane has an upper limit on the number of lists he can read each day. :)

-Doug

On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:16, Bob wrote:

What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems pl/pgsql
deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make sense, and if it
did can we have a separate list?

FWIW, a good number of posts in the pgsql-sql list actually reference plpgsql,
so if you're interested in that kind of traffic, you might want to subscribe
there.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

When the list traffic demands it, perhaps it'll be considered. Until
then there's no reason to multiply lists beyond necessity. Even Tom
Lane has an upper limit on the number of lists he can read each day. :)

Since when?

;)

-Doug

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org