About column type to "varchar(1)" or "char(1)"
Good afternoon,
A question about varchar(1) and char(1).
If we have two tables
test1 (col1 varchar(1), ... ... );
test2 (col1 char(1), ... ... );
In the manuall, it written:
*Tip: * There are no performance differences between these three types,
apart from the increased storage size when using the blank-padded type.
While character(/n/) has performance advantages in some other database
systems, it has no such advantages in PostgreSQL. In most situations
text or character varying should be used instead.
As a result, setup 'col1' to either "varchar(1)" or "char(1)" does not
matter at all?
Thanks a lot,
Emi
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:06:18PM -0400, Emi Lu wrote:
Good afternoon,
A question about varchar(1) and char(1).
<snip>
As a result, setup 'col1' to either "varchar(1)" or "char(1)" does not
matter at all?
As far as storage goes, nope. Think about it, depending on your
encoding, 1 character might be 4 bytes.
char() adds padding but varchar() doesn't. That's the difference
really...
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
Show quoted text
Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.