Backup file extension

On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 12:15, Michael Schmidt wrote:

I am writing a client GUI application and am adding backup/restore
features. I noticed that different backup file extensions are used
for PostgreSQL - pgAdmin uses .backup (possible problem because it is
not consistent with 8.3 file names) and PG Lightning Admin uses .bak
(possible problem because it is generic). To reduce the chance of the
user making an error, I was wondering if it would make sense to
standardize PostgreSQL backup file extension names - something like
.pgb (PostgreSQL Backup). I Googled pgb and it doesn't look like
anything uses this extension.

I've always used .sql. Just saying.

After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, michaelmschmidt@msn.com ("Michael Schmidt") belched out:

I am writing a client GUI application and am adding backup/restore
features.� I noticed that different�backup file extensions are used
for PostgreSQL - pgAdmin uses .backup (possible problem because it
is not consistent with 8.3 file names) and PG Lightning Admin uses
.bak (possible problem because it is generic).� To reduce the chance
of the user making an error, I was wondering if it would make sense
to standardize PostgreSQL backup file extension names - something
like .pgb (PostgreSQL Backup).� I Googled pgb and it doesn't look
like anything uses this extension.

Well, Unix doesn't have any notion of "extensions." That's something
for legacy operating systems, like MVS, CP/M, MS/DOS, and such.

On modern OSes, they generally simply support having long names, and
you are free to use whatever prefix/suffix combinations you prefer.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="gmail.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/rdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #128. "I will not employ robots as agents
of destruction if there is any possible way that they can be
re-programmed or if their battery packs are externally mounted and
easily removable." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/&gt;