Licensing of .DLL files
Hello,
We'd like to distribute the following .DLL files within our software so
as our users don't have to install these files separately:
comerr32.dll, krb5_32.dll, libeay32.dll, libintl-2.dll, libiconv-2.dll
and ssleay32.dll.
However, the problem is that we don't know who we shall contact to get
the permission or learn about the conditions for distribution.
We know about BSD license to the libpq.dll file, however does it include
also the above mentioned libraries? Are the above mentioned files
covered by the PostgreSQL copyright as well?
Could you please advise? Any tips will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks very much.
Kind regards,
Vladimira Nitrova
--------------------------------------------------
CHARONWARE s.r.o.
Ulehlova 267/5, 70030 Ostrava, Czech Republic
http://www.casestudio.com - Data modeling tools
E-mail: vnitrova@casestudio.com
On 20/3/06 13:17, "Vladimira Nitrova" <vnitrova@casestudio.com> wrote:
Hello,
We'd like to distribute the following .DLL files within our software so
as our users don't have to install these files separately:
comerr32.dll, krb5_32.dll, libeay32.dll, libintl-2.dll, libiconv-2.dll
and ssleay32.dll.However, the problem is that we don't know who we shall contact to get
the permission or learn about the conditions for distribution.We know about BSD license to the libpq.dll file, however does it include
also the above mentioned libraries? Are the above mentioned files
covered by the PostgreSQL copyright as well?Could you please advise? Any tips will be greatly appreciated.
Unfortunately they are not covered by the BSD licence
comerr32.dll & krb5_32.dll are part of MIT Kerberos, released under the MIT
licence iirc - http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/index.html
libintl-2.dll & libiconv-2.dll are from GNU Gettext, released under the LGPL
licence (iirc) - http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/
libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll are from OpenSSL, released under the OpenSSL
licence (again, IIRC) - http://www.openssl.org.
All these components are technically optional though - if you don't need one
or more, you can compile your own build of PostgreSQL without any one of
them - see the --with-openssl, --enable-nls and --with-kerberos configure
options.
Regards, Dave.
None of these licenses prohibit distribution, AFAIK.
You may have to offer source, etc. We normally just
bundle all source tar files for similar components that
we distribute with our code.
Dave Page wrote:
Show quoted text
On 20/3/06 13:17, "Vladimira Nitrova" <vnitrova@casestudio.com> wrote:
Hello,
We'd like to distribute the following .DLL files within our software so
as our users don't have to install these files separately:
comerr32.dll, krb5_32.dll, libeay32.dll, libintl-2.dll, libiconv-2.dll
and ssleay32.dll.However, the problem is that we don't know who we shall contact to get
the permission or learn about the conditions for distribution.We know about BSD license to the libpq.dll file, however does it include
also the above mentioned libraries? Are the above mentioned files
covered by the PostgreSQL copyright as well?Could you please advise? Any tips will be greatly appreciated.
Unfortunately they are not covered by the BSD licence
comerr32.dll & krb5_32.dll are part of MIT Kerberos, released under the MIT
licence iirc - http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/index.htmllibintl-2.dll & libiconv-2.dll are from GNU Gettext, released under the LGPL
licence (iirc) - http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll are from OpenSSL, released under the OpenSSL
licence (again, IIRC) - http://www.openssl.org.All these components are technically optional though - if you don't need one
or more, you can compile your own build of PostgreSQL without any one of
them - see the --with-openssl, --enable-nls and --with-kerberos configure
options.Regards, Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
None of these licenses prohibit distribution, AFAIK.
You may have to offer source, etc. We normally just bundle
all source tar files for similar components that we
distribute with our code.
If you do that, there's definitl no problem. We wouldn't bundle anything
that doesn't uphold *that* requirement.
The GPL is the "worst case", because it may have effects on your
software. PostGIS is the only GPL part of pginstaller. If you're
worried, don't distribute it. Or talk to the PostGIS people about it :-)
//Magnus
Import Notes
Resolved by subject fallback