FAQ 1.1

Started by Michael Talbot-Wilsonabout 20 years ago18 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

I've read the politically correct answer, "Post-Gres-Q-L" but it's
such a mouthful, such a day's work to pronounce, that there must be a
real street pronunciation, or a number of them, that are not being
confessed to.

They say that SQL should be pronounced "Sequel" and I've even met
people who do that. The need for a simple pronunciation with many
fewer than 4 syllables seems more urgent for PostgreSQL.

"Pig Swill" is an easy guess. It is quite catchy and simple. But I
wonder if there are other, perhaps more flattering pronunciations.

Do you have a snappy pronunciation and what is it? I'd be interested
in what the babble is at your PostgreSQL site.

#2The Hermit Hacker
scrappy@hub.org
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

I've read the politically correct answer, "Post-Gres-Q-L" but it's
such a mouthful, such a day's work to pronounce, that there must be a
real street pronunciation, or a number of them, that are not being
confessed to.

They say that SQL should be pronounced "Sequel" and I've even met
people who do that. The need for a simple pronunciation with many
fewer than 4 syllables seems more urgent for PostgreSQL.

"Pig Swill" is an easy guess. It is quite catchy and simple. But I
wonder if there are other, perhaps more flattering pronunciations.

Do you have a snappy pronunciation and what is it? I'd be interested
in what the babble is at your PostgreSQL site.

I pronounce it as above, or just refer to it as 'p-g-s-q-l' ... others
just refer to it as postgres ... and I've heard of 'pig squeal', but had
heard 'pig swill' ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> writes:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

I've read the politically correct answer, "Post-Gres-Q-L" but it's
such a mouthful, such a day's work to pronounce, that there must be a
real street pronunciation, or a number of them, that are not being
confessed to.

I think most of us just say "Postgres" ;-)

"Pig Swill" is an easy guess. It is quite catchy and simple. But I
wonder if there are other, perhaps more flattering pronunciations.

I've always read the names of these mailing lists as "pig-squeal" ...
seems very appropriate for discussion forums, if not for the product ...

regards, tom lane

#4Doug McNaught
doug@mcnaught.org
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> writes:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

"Postgres"

-Doug

#5Steve Atkins
steve@blighty.com
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote:

Do you have a snappy pronunciation and what is it? I'd be interested
in what the babble is at your PostgreSQL site.

Externally, to customers, "post-gres-kwul".

Internally, "the database".

Cheers,
Steve

In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Klint Gore wrote:

They say that SQL should be pronounced "Sequel" and I've even met
people who do that.

...
Who's "they"? The only datbase vendor I've heard call their own product
"sequel" is MS.

E.g. Sybex "SQL Instant Reference" (1993), page 2.

#7Klint Gore
kg@kgb.une.edu.au
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:10:15 +0930 (CST), Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> wrote:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

we just use postgres.

They say that SQL should be pronounced "Sequel" and I've even met
people who do that.

I hate that. It's an acronym not a word - you say the letters.

Who's "they"? The only datbase vendor I've heard call their own product
"sequel" is MS.

klint.

+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
: Klint Gore                            : "Non rhyming    :
: EMail   : kg@kgb.une.edu.au           :  slang - the    :
: Snail   : A.B.R.I.                    :  possibilities  :
: Mail      University of New England   :  are useless"   :
:           Armidale NSW 2351 Australia :     L.J.J.      :
: Fax     : +61 2 6772 5376             :                 :
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
#8Geoffrey
esoteric@3times25.net
In reply to: Michael Talbot-Wilson (#1)
Re: FAQ 1.1

Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

http://www.serioustechnology.com/postgres.ogg

Or for those of you who have an inferior operating system:

http://www.serioustechnology.com/postgres.wav

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin

#9Noname
karly@kipshouse.org
In reply to: Geoffrey (#8)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:14:28 +1000 Klint Gore <kg@kgb.une.edu.au> wrote:

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:10:15 +0930 (CST), Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> wrote:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

we just use postgres.

Post Gress is what I've heard also.

They say that SQL should be pronounced "Sequel" and I've even met
people who do that.

I hate that. It's an acronym not a word - you say the letters.

Uh, an acronym _is_ a word. That's the definition. (NASA, WAC,
RADAR, etc.) If it's pronounced as a list of letters, then it's not really
an acronym, even though it is in common usage (cf. TLA, ETLA, etc.)

Though after reading the Wiki on TLA, I see that we languaage
purists have tried to reclaim acronym by retrofitting the
definition of TLA to be three letter _abbreviation_.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tla

Sorry for the digression. {-;

-karl

#10Ron Mayer
rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com
In reply to: Klint Gore (#7)
Re: FAQ 1.1

ANSI has declared that the official pronunciation for SQL is /ɛs kjuː ɛl/

Klint Gore wrote:

Who's "they"? The only datbase vendor I've heard call their own product
"sequel" is MS.

SEQUEL (pronounced sequel) was a predecessor to SQL in IBM's 1970's
System R database; but isn't really the same thing as SQL.

[both statements from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sql ]

#11Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Doug McNaught (#4)
Re: FAQ 1.1

Douglas McNaught wrote:

Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> writes:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

"Postgres"

The first sentence of the FAQ is:

<P>PostgreSQL is pronounced <I>Post-Gres-Q-L</I>, and is also sometimes
referred to as just <I>Postgres</I>.

Is that unclear?

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#12Tino Wildenhain
tino@wildenhain.de
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#11)
Re: FAQ 1.1

Bruce Momjian schrieb:

Douglas McNaught wrote:

Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> writes:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

"Postgres"

The first sentence of the FAQ is:

<P>PostgreSQL is pronounced <I>Post-Gres-Q-L</I>, and is also sometimes
referred to as just <I>Postgres</I>.

Is that unclear?

Maybe it would be better to write it like that in logos and stuff:
PostGresQL or something like that ;)

++Tino

#13Dave Page
dpage@pgadmin.org
In reply to: Tino Wildenhain (#12)
Re: FAQ 1.1

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tino
Wildenhain
Sent: 31 March 2006 09:51
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Douglas McNaught; Michael Talbot-Wilson;
pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FAQ 1.1

Bruce Momjian schrieb:

Douglas McNaught wrote:

Michael Talbot-Wilson <mtw@view.net.au> writes:

How, really, do people pronounce PostgreSQL?

"Postgres"

The first sentence of the FAQ is:

<P>PostgreSQL is pronounced <I>Post-Gres-Q-L</I>, and

is also sometimes

referred to as just <I>Postgres</I>.

Is that unclear?

Maybe it would be better to write it like that in logos and stuff:
PostGresQL or something like that ;)

Given the tendency people have to remove the capitalised bits to get
'postgre', we'd probably end up with 'ostres'

:-)

/D

#14Jim Nasby
Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com
In reply to: Dave Page (#13)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Mar 31, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Dave Page wrote:

Given the tendency people have to remove the capitalised bits to get
'postgre', we'd probably end up with 'ostres'

Man I hate when people do that.

I think we should just rename the database to 'Fred'. :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

#15Chris Browne
cbbrowne@acm.org
In reply to: Dave Page (#13)
Re: FAQ 1.1

jnasby@pervasive.com (Jim Nasby) writes:

On Mar 31, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Dave Page wrote:

Given the tendency people have to remove the capitalised bits to get
'postgre', we'd probably end up with 'ostres'

Man I hate when people do that.

I think we should just rename the database to 'Fred'. :)

Yeah, someone at the office was asking me on the elevator about
whether some Post-something was somehow up and coming.

In retrospect, I think he was trying to pronounce Postgre, and arrived
at something I had never heard before...
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/lisp.html
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could
hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be
twenty-one, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in
seven years." -- Mark Twain

#16Jim Nasby
Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com
In reply to: Chris Browne (#15)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Apr 3, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Chris Browne wrote:

jnasby@pervasive.com (Jim Nasby) writes:

On Mar 31, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Dave Page wrote:

Given the tendency people have to remove the capitalised bits to get
'postgre', we'd probably end up with 'ostres'

Man I hate when people do that.

I think we should just rename the database to 'Fred'. :)

Yeah, someone at the office was asking me on the elevator about
whether some Post-something was somehow up and coming.

In retrospect, I think he was trying to pronounce Postgre, and arrived
at something I had never heard before...

And it doesn't help when "post-something" could also mean a very
popular MTA...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

#17Roman Neuhauser
neuhauser@sigpipe.cz
In reply to: Jim Nasby (#16)
Re: FAQ 1.1

# jnasby@pervasive.com / 2006-04-06 12:03:18 -0400:

On Apr 3, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Chris Browne wrote:

Yeah, someone at the office was asking me on the elevator about
whether some Post-something was somehow up and coming.

In retrospect, I think he was trying to pronounce Postgre, and arrived
at something I had never heard before...

And it doesn't help when "post-something" could also mean a very
popular MTA...

Looks like a missed opportunity for a April 1st announcement
of disambiguating the two by renaming "postgres" to "pregross". :)

--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991

#18Michael Fuhr
mike@fuhr.org
In reply to: Roman Neuhauser (#17)
Re: FAQ 1.1

On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:26:32AM +0000, User Roman wrote:

Looks like a missed opportunity for a April 1st announcement
of disambiguating the two by renaming "postgres" to "pregross". :)

Not exactly that change, but....

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00023.php

--
Michael Fuhr