database design questions

On 4/3/06, Ottavio Campana <ottavio@campana.vi.it> wrote:

3) faq 4.11.1 says

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

is automatically translated into this:

CREATE SEQUENCE person_id_seq;
CREATE TABLE person (
id INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('person_id_seq'),
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Thank you

Is there a reason not to write explicitly?

CREATE SEQUENCE person_id_seq;
CREATE TABLE person (
id INT8 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('person_id_seq'),
name TEXT
);

Tomislav

--- Tomi NA <hefest@gmail.com> wrote:

On 4/3/06, Ottavio Campana <ottavio@campana.vi.it> wrote:

3) faq 4.11.1 says

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

is automatically translated into this:

CREATE SEQUENCE person_id_seq;
CREATE TABLE person (
id INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('person_id_seq'),
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Thank you

Is there a reason not to write explicitly?

CREATE SEQUENCE person_id_seq;
CREATE TABLE person (
id INT8 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('person_id_seq'),
name TEXT
);

you could also do:

CREATE TABLE person (
id BIGSERIAL,
name TEXT
);

Regards,

Richard

Ottavio Campana wrote:

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Do you really expect that sequence to reach over 2 billion? Otherwise
I'd stick with the SERIAL, nothing wrong with that unless you're selling
electrons seperately or something like that (hmm... how much are they? I
sure could use a few extra).

--
Alban Hertroys
alban@magproductions.nl

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede

// Integrate Your World //

create table person (
id serial8,
name text
);

Alex

on 4/3/06 7:38 AM, ottavio@campana.vi.it purportedly said:

1) The database I'm going to develop is a big list with a catalog of
items and I want to store subsets of this list representing the
available items in several places.

My idea is to create the big table with all the elements and then to
create another table, where each row holds a pair (id_item, id_place)
and thanks to this create several views, joining the two tables
and selecting the rows with a give id_place.

Do you think it's too heavy? Is there a simpler way to do it?

On the surface, perhaps. Depending on your implementation details, you may
be adding unnecessary overhead. No one can really say since we don't know
what you are trying to accomplish.

2) do you think it's possible in a plpgsql procedure select the name of
a table into a variable and use that variable in the query?

I mean, can I do something like

SELECT INTO table_name get_table_name();
SELECT * FROM table_name;

Yes, kind of. I.e., you can probably do what you want but not with the
syntax you are showing. See SELECT INTO and EXECUTE in chapter 36 of the
online docs.

3) faq 4.11.1 says

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

is automatically translated into this:

CREATE SEQUENCE person_id_seq;
CREATE TABLE person (
id INT4 NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('person_id_seq'),
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Use BIGSERIAL instead.

Best,

Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
"Demystifying technology for your home or business"

Alban Hertroys wrote:

Ottavio Campana wrote:

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Do you really expect that sequence to reach over 2 billion? Otherwise
I'd stick with the SERIAL, nothing wrong with that unless you're selling

Depends on what the dynamics of his design are. I.e. if he frequently
creates and deletes "people", then he can consume a lot of "id-space"
even though there aren't many real people in the database itself.

Personally, I doubt this is the case. But, can see other applications
where this could be true. Since you can't reuse old id's, it's easier
to just use a bigger size datum than having to worry how the database
will react when/if you run out of them!

electrons seperately or something like that (hmm... how much are they? I
sure could use a few extra).

Three for a quark... keep the charge! [sic] :>

--don

Alban Hertroys wrote:

Ottavio Campana wrote:

CREATE TABLE person (
id SERIAL,
name TEXT
);

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

Do you really expect that sequence to reach over 2 billion? Otherwise
I'd stick with the SERIAL, nothing wrong with that unless you're selling
electrons seperately or something like that (hmm... how much are they? I
sure could use a few extra).

I agree wih you, but I think that in the feature the could be more than
2 billions. I don't want to alter in the future the database

--
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.

On 4/3/06, Ottavio Campana <ottavio@campana.vi.it> wrote:

1) The database I'm going to develop is a big list with a catalog of
items and I want to store subsets of this list representing the
available items in several places.
My idea is to create the big table with all the elements and then to
create another table, where each row holds a pair (id_item, id_place)
and thanks to this create several views, joining the two tables
and selecting the rows with a give id_place.
Do you think it's too heavy? Is there a simpler way to do it?

sorry but i dont understand your description. could you make a small example
of this layout?

2) do you think it's possible in a plpgsql procedure select the name of

a table into a variable and use that variable in the query?

possible, but not really good way. read about 'execute' in plpgsql.

3) faq 4.11.1 says

how can I do it with a INT8 instead of a INT4?

use bigserial instead of serial

depesz

hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:

2) do you think it's possible in a plpgsql procedure select the name of
a table into a variable and use that variable in the query?
possible, but not really good way. read about 'execute' in plpgsql.

why isn't it good?

I mean, from my point of view is like a function accepting a pointer. In
many languages it is used.

--
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.

On 4/4/06, Ottavio Campana <ottavio@campana.vi.it> wrote:

hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:

2) do you think it's possible in a plpgsql procedure select the

name of

a table into a variable and use that variable in the query?
possible, but not really good way. read about 'execute' in plpgsql.

why isn't it good?
I mean, from my point of view is like a function accepting a pointer. In
many languages it is used.

when coding in plpgsql you have to use dynamic queries to use this kind of
thing. this - by itself - is not bad. but it has certain performance penalty
when compared to standard queries.
i think reading plpgsql's manual about "execute" is the best one can do
about it :)

best regards

depesz