ERROR: could not access status of transaction

Started by Stuart Grimshawover 19 years ago3 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Stuart Grimshaw
stuart.grimshaw@gmail.com

berble=# select * from headlines ;
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 1668180339
DETAIL: could not open file "pg_clog/0636": No such file or directory

Using Postgres 8.1.5 from Debian unstable, I got the above error, and
I have no idea what it means?

--
-S

Sports Photography in South Yorkshire & Derbyshire
http://www.stuartgrimshaw.co.uk

#2Stuart Grimshaw
stuart.grimshaw@gmail.com
In reply to: Stuart Grimshaw (#1)
Re: ERROR: could not access status of transaction

On 12/23/06, Stuart Grimshaw <stuart.grimshaw@gmail.com> wrote:

berble=# select * from headlines ;
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 1668180339
DETAIL: could not open file "pg_clog/0636": No such file or directory

Using Postgres 8.1.5 from Debian unstable, I got the above error, and
I have no idea what it means?

Is there any more info I can give you guys to help sort this out?

--
-S

Sports Photography in South Yorkshire & Derbyshire
http://www.stuartgrimshaw.co.uk

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Stuart Grimshaw (#2)
Re: ERROR: could not access status of transaction

"Stuart Grimshaw" <stuart.grimshaw@gmail.com> writes:

On 12/23/06, Stuart Grimshaw <stuart.grimshaw@gmail.com> wrote:

berble=# select * from headlines ;
ERROR: could not access status of transaction 1668180339
DETAIL: could not open file "pg_clog/0636": No such file or directory

Using Postgres 8.1.5 from Debian unstable, I got the above error, and
I have no idea what it means?

It looks like a corrupt-data problem, specifically something has stomped
on the xmin field of a tuple header. (Because xmin is the first
readily-checkable field examined when visiting a tuple, "could not
access status of transaction" is the most likely result from wholesale
overwriting of a portion of a table.) My calculator says 1668180339 is
equal to ASCII "cnis" (or "sinc" depending on your machine's endianness)
which makes it seem somewhat likely that some text has gotten dumped
into a Postgres data file. We've seen that happen before from disk or
operating system misfeasance :-(. See the PG archives concerning
procedures for localizing and removing trashed rows --- as a first guess
about where it's discussed, try searching for threads mentioning
pg_filedump ...

regards, tom lane