Small request re error message
Could the below message be modified:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.
By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
(0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
(0x00000336).
This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
Scott Ribe wrote:
Could the below message be modified:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
(0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
(0x00000336).This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)
I don't understand how the hex values help.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:
Scott Ribe wrote:
Could the below message be modified:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
(0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
(0x00000336).This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)I don't understand how the hex values help.
With the hex values, it becomes immediately obvious that the problem is
caused by endianess (to me, anyway)
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:
Scott Ribe wrote:
Could the below message be modified:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
(0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
(0x00000336).This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)I don't understand how the hex values help.
With the hex values, it becomes immediately obvious that the problem is
caused by endianess (to me, anyway)
Oh. Yea, I can see that, but even if the endian-ness is the same, it
still might not work. Even a different compiler flag will cause a
failure to run properly.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Oh. Yea, I can see that, but even if the endian-ness is the same, it
still might not work. Even a different compiler flag will cause a
failure to run properly.
Sure. You can't flag every possible error. But my Intel & PPC Macs look
identical, and I compile with identical flags. So it would help people like
me, all one or two of us ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
Scott Ribe wrote:
Oh. Yea, I can see that, but even if the endian-ness is the same, it
still might not work. Even a different compiler flag will cause a
failure to run properly.Sure. You can't flag every possible error. But my Intel & PPC Macs look
identical, and I compile with identical flags. So it would help people like
me, all one or two of us ;-)
What would make more sense than printing the hex is to print a specific
message if the endian-ness doesn't match, but I am worried people might
assume it will work when the endian does match.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Scott Ribe wrote:
Oh. Yea, I can see that, but even if the endian-ness is the same, it
still might not work. Even a different compiler flag will cause a
failure to run properly.Sure. You can't flag every possible error. But my Intel & PPC Macs look
identical, and I compile with identical flags. So it would help people like
me, all one or two of us ;-)What would make more sense than printing the hex is to print a specific
message if the endian-ness doesn't match, but I am worried people might
assume it will work when the endian does match.
That doesn't make much sense because we give different error messages,
each telling that one little check failed.
I think adding the hex code is not helpful in the general case, but
maybe we could check for endianness if the control version fails, and
add that info in a HINT or something.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support