There are advantages to having an odd name
From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful
if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL".
Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one
else would want ...
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/18/0344251.shtml?tid=154
(I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh,
the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are
Firebird not FirebirdSQL.)
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane kirjutas L, 19.04.2003 kell 05:53:
From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful
if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL".
Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one
else would want ...
It's good to be reminded (in the light of the 'losing momentum'
discussion focusing mainly on MySQL) that there are also 'real'
databases (Interbase/firebird and SAP DB) that have possibility to catch
up with us.
One of the posts claimed Firebird (SQL) to be so good that if they could
get 1/10th of the resources that postgresSQL has then postgreSQL wil be
obliviated in 2 years ;-p
(I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh,
the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are
Firebird not FirebirdSQL.)
I was also quite upset by it.
I quite liked the proposal in another post proposing to name browsers
like unix commands so Phoenix/Firebird could be just 'br' ;)
-----------
Hannu
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Tom Lane kirjutas L, 19.04.2003 kell 05:53:
From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful
if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL".
Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one
else would want ...It's good to be reminded (in the light of the 'losing momentum'
discussion focusing mainly on MySQL) that there are also 'real'
databases (Interbase/firebird and SAP DB) that have possibility to catch
up with us.One of the posts claimed Firebird (SQL) to be so good that if they could
get 1/10th of the resources that postgresSQL has then postgreSQL wil be
obliviated in 2 years ;-p(I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh,
the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are
Firebird not FirebirdSQL.)I was also quite upset by it.
I quite liked the proposal in another post proposing to name browsers
like unix commands so Phoenix/Firebird could be just 'br' ;)
I am wondering if they should switch to FirebirdSQL for clarity --- of
course, it would be nice if Mozilla would change, but I don't see how
you can call it FirebirdBrowser.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073