Records Number
Hi all,
I have a little problem,
I would like to execute
select * from table
and i would like to retrieve the number of records without make
select count(*) from table
I could use directly the table instead of select, and in this this
case I'm searching for
something like the reltuples field in the pg_class table, but I need
this value in real time.
Any suggestion?
Enrico
--
That's one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind
Enrico Pirozzi
Tel. +39 0861 1855771
Mob.+39 328 4164437
Fax +39 0861 1850310
www.enricopirozzi.info
info@enricopirozzi.info
Skype sscotty71
Enrico Pirozzi wrote:
and i would like to retrieve the number of records without make
select count(*) from table
I could use directly the table instead of select, and in this this
case I'm searching for
something like the reltuples field in the pg_class table, but I need
this value in real time.
If you want an accurate, up-to-date count then you'll need to use
count(*) or have a trigger keep a summary-count for you. A simple
implementation will reduce concurrency to writes on that table however.
Lots of discussion in the mailing-list archives on this.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
If you want an accurate, up-to-date count then you'll need to use
count(*) or have a trigger keep a summary-count for you. A simple
implementation will reduce concurrency to writes on that table however.
Yes I solved by a trigger....
Lots of discussion in the mailing-list archives on this.
Thank you for your time
Enrico
--
That's one small step for man; one giant leap for mankind
Enrico Pirozzi
Tel. +39 0861 1855771
Mob.+39 328 4164437
Fax +39 0861 1850310
www.enricopirozzi.info
info@enricopirozzi.info
Skype sscotty71
Richard Huxton, 17.03.2009 13:26:
Enrico Pirozzi wrote:
and i would like to retrieve the number of records without make
select count(*) from table
I could use directly the table instead of select, and in this this
case I'm searching for
something like the reltuples field in the pg_class table, but I need
this value in real time.If you want an accurate, up-to-date count then you'll need to use
count(*) or have a trigger keep a summary-count for you. A simple
implementation will reduce concurrency to writes on that table however.
Lots of discussion in the mailing-list archives on this.
Can a trigger solution really give an accurate count in a concurrent insert/delete scenario?
Thomas
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> writes:
Can a trigger solution really give an accurate count in a concurrent insert/delete scenario?
In principle yes, but AFAIK no one has really coded it up in full
detail. See the design that was hashed out in some previous
mailing-list thread, involving delta-count records entered into
a tracking table by each transaction that inserts or deletes.
regards, tom lane