src/interfaces/cli

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

Does anyone mind if I remove src/interfaces/cli? It's clearly outdated
and useless.

Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of
building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never
went further than an initial commit.

If ecpg itself now satisfies that spec then there's certainly no
need for src/interfaces/cli ...

regards, tom lane

Agreed. I have been using ecpg a little and it is really great.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

Does anyone mind if I remove src/interfaces/cli? It's clearly outdated
and useless.

Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of
building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never
went further than an initial commit.

If ecpg itself now satisfies that spec then there's certainly no
need for src/interfaces/cli ...

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Tom Lane writes:

Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of
building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never
went further than an initial commit.

CLI is ODBC, not ecpg.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net