Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions

Started by Henri De Feraudyover 15 years ago4 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Henri De Feraudy
feraudyh@yahoo.com

Hello,
I've been writing an application that allows me to edit simple maps. It
involves Postgis but here I think I have run into
a basic Postgres consideration.
I did a bit of editing of a map which involved creating a polygon with a
selection, inserting into a database and reloading
the "layer" where this geometric information lies.
There I was editing quite happily for about an hour and a half. I left my
application and came back to it in the evening:
all my work was lost.
Could this be due to the fact I had not committed my insertions to the database?
I mean, if you are inserting into a table from PLPGSQL do you have to do an
explicit commit at some stage?
I'm really quite a newbie as you can see.

#2Andy Colson
andy@squeakycode.net
In reply to: Henri De Feraudy (#1)
Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions

On 9/29/2010 11:31 AM, Henri De Feraudy wrote:

Hello,
I've been writing an application that allows me to edit simple maps. It
involves Postgis but here I think I have run into
a basic Postgres consideration.
I did a bit of editing of a map which involved creating a polygon with a
selection, inserting into a database and reloading
the "layer" where this geometric information lies.
There I was editing quite happily for about an hour and a half. I left
my application and came back to it in the evening:
all my work was lost.
Could this be due to the fact I had not committed my insertions to the
database?
I mean, if you are inserting into a table from PLPGSQL do you have to do
an explicit commit at some stage?
I'm really quite a newbie as you can see.

Yes, you really must commit.

Now, sometimes, some languages/tools will "help" you and autocommit. It
depends on what language/tools/etc you are using.

This is a wookie! If that does not make sense, you must commit!
-south park, slightly paraphrased

-Andy

#3Merlin Moncure
mmoncure@gmail.com
In reply to: Andy Colson (#2)
Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote:

On 9/29/2010 11:31 AM, Henri De Feraudy wrote:

Hello,
I've been writing an application that allows me to edit simple maps. It
involves Postgis but here I think I have run into
a basic Postgres consideration.
I did a bit of editing of a map which involved creating a polygon with a
selection, inserting into a database and reloading
the "layer" where this geometric information lies.
There I was editing quite happily for about an hour and a half. I left
my application and came back to it in the evening:
all my work was lost.
Could this be due to the fact I had not committed my insertions to the
database?
I mean, if you are inserting into a table from PLPGSQL do you have to do
an explicit commit at some stage?
I'm really quite a newbie as you can see.

Yes, you really must commit.

Now, sometimes, some languages/tools will "help" you and autocommit.  It
depends on what language/tools/etc you are using.

yes...one more note about this: It is absolutely never (IMNSHO) a
good idea to intentionally hold transactions open while waiting on
user input except for testing purposes.

merlin

#4Alban Hertroys
dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl
In reply to: Henri De Feraudy (#1)
Re: Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions

On 29 Sep 2010, at 18:31, Henri De Feraudy wrote:

I mean, if you are inserting into a table from PLPGSQL do you have to do an
explicit commit at some stage?

I suppose you meant psql here, as otherwise the above statement wouldn't make sense ;)

Alban Hertroys

--
Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling.

!DSPAM:737,4ca371b7678305060513005!