function with multiple return values
I've created the following function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION latest ( lot_id int4,
condition text, OUT perc smallint, OUT entry_date date )
RETURNS SETOF record AS
'
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY SELECT t1.perc, t1.entry_date
FROM t1, t2
WHERE t1.condition_id=t2.id and t1.lot_id = $1 and t2.code = $2
ORDER BY entry_date DESC LIMIT 1;
END;
' language 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
It works for this:
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*
returning perc and entry_date each in it's own column.
Problem is:
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*, (latest(38787,'FI')).*;
returns 4 columns: perc, entry_date, perc, entry_date
Tried:
select perc as p1, perc as perc2 from (
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*, (latest(38787,'FI')).*
) as foo;
just to see -- it says perc is ambiguous... well yes it is! :)
Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?
Or maybe there is a different way to return 2 values from a function?
Thanks,
Scott
Scott Serr <serrs@theserrs.net> wrote:
I've created the following function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION latest ( lot_id int4,
condition text, OUT perc smallint, OUT entry_date date )
RETURNS SETOF record AS
'
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY SELECT t1.perc, t1.entry_date
FROM t1, t2
WHERE t1.condition_id=t2.id and t1.lot_id = $1 and t2.code = $2
ORDER BY entry_date DESC LIMIT 1;
END;
' language 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;It works for this:
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*
returning perc and entry_date each in it's own column.Problem is:
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*, (latest(38787,'FI')).*;
returns 4 columns: perc, entry_date, perc, entry_dateTried:
select perc as p1, perc as perc2 from (
select (latest(38787,'IP')).*, (latest(38787,'FI')).*
) as foo;
just to see -- it says perc is ambiguous... well yes it is! :)Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?
Or maybe there is a different way to return 2 values from a function?
You can use alias-names for the 2 queries, like:
test=*# select * from foo();
a | b
---+---
1 | 2
(1 row)
Time: 0.279 ms
test=*# select foobar.a as x, foobar.b as y, bar.* from (select * from foo()) foobar, (select * from foo()) bar ;
x | y | a | b
---+---+---+---
1 | 2 | 1 | 2
(1 row)
Now you have unique column names.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082�, E 13.56889�
Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net> writes:
Scott Serr <serrs@theserrs.net> wrote:
Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?
You can use alias-names for the 2 queries, like:
test=*# select foobar.a as x, foobar.b as y, bar.* from (select * from foo()) foobar, (select * from foo()) bar ;
You don't really need the sub-selects: you can put aliases on functions
in FROM.
select * from foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y);
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net> writes:
Scott Serr <serrs@theserrs.net> wrote:
Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?You can use alias-names for the 2 queries, like:
test=*# select foobar.a as x, foobar.b as y, bar.* from (select * from foo()) foobar, (select * from foo()) bar ;
You don't really need the sub-selects: you can put aliases on functions
in FROM.select * from foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y);
Right, thx, blackout ...
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082�, E 13.56889�
On 11/07/2010 08:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Kretschmer<akretschmer@spamfence.net> writes:
Scott Serr<serrs@theserrs.net> wrote:
Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?You can use alias-names for the 2 queries, like:
test=*# select foobar.a as x, foobar.b as y, bar.* from (select * from foo()) foobar, (select * from foo()) bar ;You don't really need the sub-selects: you can put aliases on functions
in FROM.select * from foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y);
regards, tom lane
Thanks Tom, Andreas, and Osvaldo...
I've found I really need these on the Select part rather than the From.
select otherstuff.*, foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y) from
otherstuff;
...won't work. It says:
subquery must return only one column
Funny thing is
select (foo(...)).*, (foo(...)).*;
...works fine, just has duplicate column names, so they are hard to get at.
I modeled this after examples here
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/129-Use-of-OUT-and-INOUT-Parameters.html
I really only want a single record back from my function, but the
multi-record return looked easier. I need some kind of control of how
the columns are named per call.
Maybe this isn't possible... not alot of docs in this area.
Thanks,
Scott
2010/11/7 Scott Serr <serrs@theserrs.net>:
On 11/07/2010 08:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Kretschmer<akretschmer@spamfence.net> writes:
Scott Serr<serrs@theserrs.net> wrote:
Ideas on how to uniquely name the first and second set of "perc,
entry_date"?You can use alias-names for the 2 queries, like:
test=*# select foobar.a as x, foobar.b as y, bar.* from (select * from
foo()) foobar, (select * from foo()) bar ;You don't really need the sub-selects: you can put aliases on functions
in FROM.select * from foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y);
regards, tom lane
Thanks Tom, Andreas, and Osvaldo...
I've found I really need these on the Select part rather than the From.
select otherstuff.*, foo(...) as f1(a,b), foo(...) as f2(x,y) from
otherstuff;
...won't work. It says:
subquery must return only one columnFunny thing is
select (foo(...)).*, (foo(...)).*;
...works fine, just has duplicate column names, so they are hard to get at.
Attention: this syntax is great, but function is evaluated for every
column one times!
Regards
Pavel Stehule
Show quoted text
I modeled this after examples here
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/index.php?/archives/129-Use-of-OUT-and-INOUT-Parameters.htmlI really only want a single record back from my function, but the
multi-record return looked easier. I need some kind of control of how the
columns are named per call.Maybe this isn't possible... not alot of docs in this area.
Thanks,
Scott--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general