Rule regression failure freebsd?
See attached regression.diffs.
Chris
parallel group (5 tests): select_views portals_p2 cluster foreign_key rules
select_views ... ok
portals_p2 ... ok
rules ... FAILED
foreign_key ... ok
cluster ... ok
parallel group (14 tests): limit truncate prepare sequence copy2
without_oid po
lymorphism domain rangefuncs stats conversion temp plpgsql alter_table
limit ... ok
plpgsql ... ok
copy2 ... ok
temp ... ok
domain ... ok
rangefuncs ... ok
prepare ... ok
without_oid ... ok
conversion ... ok
truncate ... ok
alter_table ... ok
sequence ... ok
polymorphism ... ok
stats ... ok
============== shutting down postmaster ==============
=======================
1 of 93 tests failed.
=======================
Attachments:
regression.diffstext/plain; name=regression.diffsDownload+5-4
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
See attached regression.diffs.
Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
See attached regression.diffs.
Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
regards, tom lane
Not exactly,
I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and
foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter
now affects the result of the former.
I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there
as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will
back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at
this stage in the release cycle.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
Jan Wieck wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
See attached regression.diffs.
Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
regards, tom lane
Not exactly,
I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and
foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter
now affects the result of the former.I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there
as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will
back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at
this stage in the release cycle.
The test is now in rule.sql.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #