issue with pg_restore
Hi list,
I'm trying to restore a backup into a database with a new name
the dump was done on a 8.4 server with:
pg_dump -F c -f bakfile olddb
i'm trying to restore it with:
createdb newdb; pg_restore -v --jobs=4 --disable-triggers
--no-tablespaces --dbname=newdb bakfile
or even just:
createdb newdb; pg_restore -v --dbname=newdb bakfile
It doesn't work .. pg_restore claims to be creating tables, indexes,
etc. and there are no errors in the output. It only takes a few seconds
to run (the file is ~250MB).
In newdb, all the tables in the "public" schema are missing. All the
functions and triggers were created though, tables in a non "public"
schema were created but don't contain data. Tried on 8.4 and on 9.0 with
the same result.
I turned on server statement logging and don't see statements that would
create the missing tables, there are alot of BEGIN/COMMIT statements
with nothing in between.
the only way i got it to work was to run:
pg_restore bakfile | psql newdb
which loads everything just fine but i was hoping to use parallel
restore to speed it up.
any ideas?
-nigel.
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:19:38 pm Nigel Heron wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to restore a backup into a database with a new namethe dump was done on a 8.4 server with:
pg_dump -F c -f bakfile olddbi'm trying to restore it with:
createdb newdb; pg_restore -v --jobs=4 --disable-triggers
--no-tablespaces --dbname=newdb bakfile
or even just:
createdb newdb; pg_restore -v --dbname=newdb bakfileIt doesn't work .. pg_restore claims to be creating tables, indexes,
etc. and there are no errors in the output. It only takes a few seconds
to run (the file is ~250MB).
In newdb, all the tables in the "public" schema are missing. All the
functions and triggers were created though, tables in a non "public"
schema were created but don't contain data. Tried on 8.4 and on 9.0 with
the same result.
I turned on server statement logging and don't see statements that would
create the missing tables, there are alot of BEGIN/COMMIT statements
with nothing in between.the only way i got it to work was to run:
pg_restore bakfile | psql newdb
which loads everything just fine but i was hoping to use parallel
restore to speed it up.any ideas?
-nigel.
You running the pg_restore as postgres user with sufficient privileges?
You can do pg_restore -f bakfile.sql bakfile to have it restore to a text file
instead of a database. Might help in seeing what is going on.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:19:38 pm Nigel Heron wrote:
I'm trying to restore a backup into a database with a new name
It doesn't work .. pg_restore claims to be creating tables, indexes,
etc. and there are no errors in the output. It only takes a few seconds
to run (the file is ~250MB).
You running the pg_restore as postgres user with sufficient privileges?
I'm wondering if it could be the same bug reported two days ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201107270042.22427.julian@mehnle.net
Have you got standard_conforming_strings turned on?
regards, tom lane
On 11-07-28 09:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver<adrian.klaver@gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:19:38 pm Nigel Heron wrote:
I'm trying to restore a backup into a database with a new name
It doesn't work .. pg_restore claims to be creating tables, indexes,
etc. and there are no errors in the output. It only takes a few seconds
to run (the file is ~250MB).You running the pg_restore as postgres user with sufficient privileges?
yes, i'm running it as the postgres superuser
I'm wondering if it could be the same bug reported two days ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201107270042.22427.julian@mehnle.net
Have you got standard_conforming_strings turned on?regards, tom lane
That must be it! I do have standard_conforming_strings on. What i found
is a string ending with a backslash as a default in a column definition
.. so that bug must be more wide spread than just comments.
eg.
CREATE TABLE foo ( bar text DEFAULT '.\somepath\' );
thanks,
-nigel.
Nigel Heron <nigel@psycode.com> writes:
On 11-07-28 09:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm wondering if it could be the same bug reported two days ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201107270042.22427.julian@mehnle.net
Have you got standard_conforming_strings turned on?
That must be it! I do have standard_conforming_strings on. What i found
is a string ending with a backslash as a default in a column definition
.. so that bug must be more wide spread than just comments.
Yeah, actually it affects any situation where a string literal in the
SQL dump ends in a backslash. I've committed a patch for it, but in the
meantime the best workaround is to not use a direct-to-database restore,
but pipe the SQL output through psql.
regards, tom lane