9.0 EXPLAIN Buffers: written=nnnn
Do EXPLAIN ANALYZE:
. . . only showing the bottom node . . .
-> Seq Scan on YYYYY
(cost=0.00..37962.29 rows=876029 width=40)
(actual time=16.728..92555.945 rows=876002 loops=1)
Output: foo, bar
Buffers:
shared hit=146
read=29056
written=2325 !!!!!
"Total runtime: 375542.347 ms"
Then Do EXPLAIN ANALYZE again:
. . . only showing the bottom node . . .
-> Seq Scan on YYYYY
(cost=0.00..37962.29 rows=876029 width=40)
(actual time=0.192..2972.127 rows=876002 loops=1)
Output: foo, bar
Buffers:
shared hit=210
read=28992
"Total runtime: 32913.884 ms"
In general, can you tell me why [written=2325] is displayed by the first EXPLAIN, but not the second EXPLAIN ?
The query is a SELECT, so what is getting "written" ?
Note that both EXPLAINs have the exact same plan. Bottom up is: Seq Scan on YYYY, Hash, Seq Scan on XXXX, Hash Join, HashAggregate
I am wondering if it is a clue as to why the "actual time" is so different from one run to the next.
The query is 2 tables joined, with a group by:
select
sum (case when X.hid is null and not Y.cntr = '0' then 1 else 0 end) as colp
from
xxxxx X
inner join yyyyy Y on Y.coln = X.colm
where
X.some_id = 'aeiou'
group by
X.some_type
Thanks,
-dvs-
El Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:03:20 -0500
<david.sahagian@emc.com> escribió:
Do EXPLAIN ANALYZE:
written=2325 !!!!!
"Total runtime: 375542.347 ms"
Then Do EXPLAIN ANALYZE again:
In general, can you tell me why [written=2325] is displayed by the
first EXPLAIN, but not the second EXPLAIN ? The query is a SELECT, so
what is getting "written" ?Note that both EXPLAINs have the exact same plan. Bottom up is: Seq
Scan on YYYY, Hash, Seq Scan on XXXX, Hash Join, HashAggregateI am wondering if it is a clue as to why the "actual time" is so
different from one run to the next.
I can be completely wrong, but maybe it is about hint bits.
Read http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hint_Bits
Thanks
Rodrigo