Code of Conduct
On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Bret Stern wrote:
Maybe Trump should write this
Unfortunately Trump would likely not follow the CoC.
Thank you for the troll.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Gosh, I've got a lot of love for CoCs; I've heard great things, really
good things, some things, about CoCs, that some of them have been
really helping in a yuge way with some fantastic projects. Sometimes
some people, a lot of people, have said that I could write a CoC, and
you know, I think they're right, because my CoC is pretty damn strong,
because I believe my CoC could Make Postgres Great Again.
On 11 January 2016 at 18:32, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Bret Stern wrote:
Maybe Trump should write this
Unfortunately Trump would likely not follow the CoC.
Thank you for the troll.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Geoff,
Gosh, I've got a lot of love for CoCs; I've heard great things, really good things, some things, about CoCs, that some of them have been really helping in a yuge way with some fantastic projects.
Sometimes some people, a lot of people, have said that I could write a CoC, and you know, I think they're right, because my CoC is pretty damn strong, because I believe my CoC could Make Postgres Great Again.
While this is funny to some, I don't think it adds value to this conversation. I would consider it a derailment and not very helpful.
If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are violating.
Thanks,
Regina
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 11 January 2016 at 20:13, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:
While this is funny to some, I don't think it adds value to this conversation. I would consider it a derailment and not very helpful.
If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are violating.
If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional
lighthearted humour to a non-development list that is intended to
offend no-one then I would most definitely remove myself from such a
project. Some may consider that a positive thing, but I would like to
think that in the main I have at least tried to help in the small ways
that I could.
Your post, on the other hand, is clearly intended to censure a fellow
contributor to the list, which I find far more offensive. I guess
that's the problem with CoCs, because to some people what's reasonable
behaviour is utterly unacceptable to others.
For what it's worth, I would consider my post to be no less on topic
for postgres-general than the original topic. Even notwithstanding
that I think it would be a complete waste of time and resources I
don't consider this the correct place to hold such a conversation:
there is a -docs list, after all. But since I'm able to simply ignore
and delete those posts that don't interest me, I didn't really see any
point in saying anything.
Geoff
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Geoff,
If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional lighthearted humour to a non-development list that is intended to offend no-one then I would most definitely remove myself from such a project.
Some may consider that a positive thing, but I would like to think that in the main I have at least tried to help in the small ways that I could.
Your post, on the other hand, is clearly intended to censure a fellow contributor to the list, which I find far more offensive. I guess that's the problem with CoCs, because to some people what's reasonable behaviour is utterly unacceptable to others.
For what it's worth, I would consider my post to be no less on topic for postgres-general than the original topic. Even notwithstanding that I think it would be a complete waste of time and resources I don't consider this the correct place to hold such a conversation:
there is a -docs list, after all. But since I'm able to simply ignore and delete those posts that don't interest me, I didn't really see any point in saying anything.
Geoff
The Coc allows light-hearted humor, I'm so disappointed you didn't get my clever punning in my last email. I thought it was a treasure.
Now while what you said is fine for this list, it's questionable it adds value to this discussion.
On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package all these and use them in regression tests for this Coc.
Thanks,
Regina
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 11 January 2016 at 21:11, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:
The Coc allows light-hearted humor, I'm so disappointed you didn't get my clever punning in my last email. I thought it was a treasure.
Hah! The irony is I had deliberately avoided making the obvious gag
because I've been called out previously for using misogynistic
language on the lists.
Apologies for missing your point :)
Geoff
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 1/11/2016 1:11 PM, Regina Obe wrote:
On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package all these and use them in regression tests for this Coc.
gee, we better get a lawyer to make sure all the language in the CoC is
ironclad and comprehensive.
/me runs screaming into the distance.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 01/11/2016 01:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/11/2016 1:11 PM, Regina Obe wrote:
On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test
the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant
and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package all
these and use them in regression tests for this Coc.gee, we better get a lawyer to make sure all the language in the CoC is
ironclad and comprehensive.
The sad part is that this is a solved issue:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
/me runs screaming into the distance.
I'm right behind you.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Regina Obe wrote:
If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are violating.
+1 funny!
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Geoff Winkless wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 20:13, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote:
While this is funny to some, I don't think it adds value to this conversation. I would consider it a derailment and not very helpful.
If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are violating.
If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional
lighthearted humour... I would most definitely remove myselfYour post, on the other hand, is clearly intended to censure a fellow
contributor ...
I think you missed the sarcasm. I thought your comment was great when I
read it, and the I though her retort was even better!!
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general