Timeline for 7.4.3?
Hey,
We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches
out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering
what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches
out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering
what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was?
Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there
are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches
out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering
what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was?Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there
are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point.
The only post-7.4.2 Solaris fixes I can think of are for threaded
builds. Do you use those? If so, you can grab CVS REL7_4_STABLE and
see how that works for you.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there
are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point.The only post-7.4.2 Solaris fixes I can think of are for threaded
builds. Do you use those? If so, you can grab CVS REL7_4_STABLE and
see how that works for you.
There are some pg_autovacum fixes, most serious being the one that
causes it to vacuum large tables far too often. I know it's a contrib
module, but does seem to be getting used a lot.
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
There are some pg_autovacum fixes, most serious being the one that
causes it to vacuum large tables far too often. I know it's a contrib
module, but does seem to be getting used a lot.
Good reason why it *should* be in GForge/GBorg ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664