Londiste 3 pgq events_1_1 table huge

Hi, Check for long running Idle in transaction sessions. Idle in transaction sessions may holding events table from cleaning itself up.
If there is more then days long running idle in transaction sessions, kill them, event table should be cleaned automatically after that.

"select pid,state, query_start from pg_stat_activity where state='idle in transaction';" for checking sessions.

Rene
________________________________________
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org <pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org> on behalf of Leonardo M. Ramé <l.rame@griensu.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:23 PM
To: PostgreSql-general
Subject: [GENERAL] Londiste 3 pgq events_1_1 table huge

Hi, I couldn't find a mailing list or forum to ask londiste related
questions, so I hope someone from this list can help me with this.

I have a Londiste based replication setup that is working perfectly
since last year. Now I noted the events_1_1 table grew too much (almost
exactly the same size of the whole database), so I'm asking how can I
clean up the events table without breaking the replication?.

Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

El 18/05/16 a las 19:03, Rene . escribi�:

Hi, Check for long running Idle in transaction sessions. Idle in transaction sessions may holding events table from cleaning itself up.
If there is more then days long running idle in transaction sessions, kill them, event table should be cleaned automatically after that.

"select pid,state, query_start from pg_stat_activity where state='idle in transaction';" for checking sessions.

Rene

Thanks Rene, I found only one "idle in transaction" and it dates from
just a couple of minutes ago, so, the reason of huge event table must be
something else.

By looking at the event_1_1 table I found records from march, but
londiste3 status shows everything is already in sync:

nodo_master (root)
| Tables: 146/0/0
| Lag: 0s, Tick: 1112197
+--: node_esclavo (leaf)
Tables: 146/0/0
Lag: 0s, Tick: 1112197

So, what if I manually delete old events?.

Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ram�
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Col�n 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- C�rdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Queue - Event are stored in queue tables i.e queues. Several producers can write
into same queue and several consumers can read from the queue. Events are kept
in queue until all the consumers have seen them.

Maybe you have some inactive consumers holding a event tables.

qadmin -h <root_node_host> -p 5432 -U postgres -d <database name> -Q <queue name>

Use 'show help;' to see available commands.
copy output of show consumer command

show consumer;

Rene

________________________________________
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org <pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org> on behalf of Leonardo M. Ramé <l.rame@griensu.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 2:43 PM
To: PostgreSql-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Londiste 3 pgq events_1_1 table huge

El 18/05/16 a las 19:03, Rene . escribió:

Hi, Check for long running Idle in transaction sessions. Idle in transaction sessions may holding events table from cleaning itself up.
If there is more then days long running idle in transaction sessions, kill them, event table should be cleaned automatically after that.

"select pid,state, query_start from pg_stat_activity where state='idle in transaction';" for checking sessions.

Rene

Thanks Rene, I found only one "idle in transaction" and it dates from
just a couple of minutes ago, so, the reason of huge event table must be
something else.

By looking at the event_1_1 table I found records from march, but
londiste3 status shows everything is already in sync:

nodo_master (root)
| Tables: 146/0/0
| Lag: 0s, Tick: 1112197
+--: node_esclavo (leaf)
Tables: 146/0/0
Lag: 0s, Tick: 1112197

So, what if I manually delete old events?.

Regards,
--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

This has happened to us where we have dead or unmanaged consumer. Turns out
londiste is keeping the event even if the consumer is unreachable. This is
to ensure that the consumer gets what it should.

To clean this up, delete the unused/dead consumer, with qadmin or manually
if necessary. The table won't be deleted immediately though. We have to
restart pgqd and workers and wait for two days.

~
Saiful Muhajir
On 19 May 2016 20:01, "Rene ." <rene0_3@hotmail.com> wrote:

El 19/05/16 a las 12:39, Saiful Muhajir escribió:

This has happened to us where we have dead or unmanaged consumer. Turns
out londiste is keeping the event even if the consumer is unreachable.
This is to ensure that the consumer gets what it should.

To clean this up, delete the unused/dead consumer, with qadmin or
manually if necessary. The table won't be deleted immediately though. We
have to restart pgqd and workers and wait for two days.

Thanks Rene and Saiful, I found two unused consumers, but after
"unregister consumer ...." those aren't deleted, what can I do to remove
them?.

--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

El 20/05/16 a las 10:19, Leonardo M. Ramé escribió:

El 19/05/16 a las 12:39, Saiful Muhajir escribió:

This has happened to us where we have dead or unmanaged consumer. Turns
out londiste is keeping the event even if the consumer is unreachable.
This is to ensure that the consumer gets what it should.

To clean this up, delete the unused/dead consumer, with qadmin or
manually if necessary. The table won't be deleted immediately though. We
have to restart pgqd and workers and wait for two days.

Thanks Rene and Saiful, I found two unused consumers, but after
"unregister consumer ...." those aren't deleted, what can I do to remove
them?.

Sorry, I successfully deleted them by using:

unregister consumer CONSUMER_NAME from QUEUE_NAME

The 2nd param QUEUE_NAME is a *must*.

Now I'm waiting for the events deletion...

Regards,

--
Leonardo M. Ramé
Medical IT - Griensu S.A.
Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A
X5000EPT -- Córdoba
Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19
Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general