Final pg_dumpall should happen in Single-User-Mode
I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to single-user-mode first.
With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine. After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.
My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was still alive and this process
inserted to the database after pg_dumpall has started.
I guess I am not the first one who did this stupid mistake.
What do you think? Wouldn't it be polite to add a note about this topic to the docs?
Here are the docs for pg_dumpall: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-dumpall.html
How could the wording look like? I am not a native speaker ....
Or do you have a better/different idea?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Just for the records, I asked here the same question and got some replies:
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/186045/how-do-i-prevent-changes-to-my-database
Am 11.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to single-user-mode first.
With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine. After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was still alive and this process
inserted to the database after pg_dumpall has started.I guess I am not the first one who did this stupid mistake.
What do you think? Wouldn't it be polite to add a note about this topic to the docs?
Here are the docs for pg_dumpall: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-dumpall.html
How could the wording look like? I am not a native speaker ....
Or do you have a better/different idea?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Just for the records, I use this solution now:
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/186045/how-do-i-prevent-changes-to-my-database/186051#186051
Change the port of PostgreSQL on prod-server-old. This way it is unlikely that clients connect to the DB during
pg_dumpall --port=OTHER_PORT
BTW: In my case a short down-time is no problem.
Regards,
Thomas
Am 20.09.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
Just for the records, I asked here the same question and got some replies:
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/186045/how-do-i-prevent-changes-to-my-database
Am 11.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to single-user-mode first.
With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine. After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was still alive and this process
inserted to the database after pg_dumpall has started.I guess I am not the first one who did this stupid mistake.
What do you think? Wouldn't it be polite to add a note about this topic to the docs?
Here are the docs for pg_dumpall: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-dumpall.html
How could the wording look like? I am not a native speaker ....
Or do you have a better/different idea?
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general