vPgSql
Maybe will be useful for someone
Very simple Postgres SQL client vPgSql:
Best regards,
Vlad Alexeenkov
Hey Vlad
пт, 17 авг. 2018 г. в 15:31, Vlad Alexeenkov <vladabc@yandex.ru>:
Maybe will be useful for someone
Very simple Postgres SQL client vPgSql:
Looking nice! Thank you. But I unable to start it on Ubuntu, because
there is no bash(1) in /usr/bin.
Also, it is open source?
Nice,
Very useful.
________________________________
De: Vlad Alexeenkov <vladabc@yandex.ru>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 17 de agosto de 2018 10:30
Para: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Assunto: vPgSql
Maybe will be useful for someone
Very simple Postgres SQL client vPgSql:
https://vsdev.ru
Gogs - Very simple PostGres SQL client vPgSql<https://vsdev.ru/>
vsdev.ru
Шаг 1 дает заготовки скриптов по созданию dblink. При их помощи или без нужно создать dblink к БД с которой будем сравнивать, при необходимости нужно установить extension
Best regards,
Vlad Alexeenkov
On 08/17/2018 05:45 AM, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
Hey Vlad
пт, 17 авг. 2018 г. в 15:31, Vlad Alexeenkov <vladabc@yandex.ru>:Maybe will be useful for someone
Very simple Postgres SQL client vPgSql:
Looking nice! Thank you. But I unable to start it on Ubuntu, because
there is no bash(1) in /usr/bin.
Bash is in /bin not /usr/bin. You should be able to edit the first line
of the start file to fix that.
JD
Also, it is open source?
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
пт, 17 авг. 2018 г. в 21:19, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
On 08/17/2018 05:45 AM, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
Hey Vlad
пт, 17 авг. 2018 г. в 15:31, Vlad Alexeenkov <vladabc@yandex.ru>:Maybe will be useful for someone
Very simple Postgres SQL client vPgSql:
Looking nice! Thank you. But I unable to start it on Ubuntu, because
there is no bash(1) in /usr/bin.Bash is in /bin not /usr/bin. You should be able to edit the first line
of the start file to fix that.
I know that, thanks :-) I just pointed out the issue to the OP.
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 15:45 +0300, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
Looking nice! Thank you. But I unable to start it on Ubuntu, because
there is no bash(1) in /usr/bin.
Thank you, i'll fix it.
Also, it is open source?
No, it is freeware
Vlad ABC <vladabc@yandex.ru> writes:
On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 15:45 +0300, Dmitry Igrishin wrote:
Looking nice! Thank you. But I unable to start it on Ubuntu, because
there is no bash(1) in /usr/bin.Thank you, i'll fix it.
I think pretty much all *nix systems put core shells like sh, bash, zsh
etc in /bin (as it is guaranteed to be available immediately at boot, while /usr is
not - it could be a separate partition which isn't available until later
in the boot process).
A way to avoid platform differences is to use /usr/bin/env e.g.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
.
Also, it is open source?
No, it is freeware
oh well, too bad.
--
Tim Cross
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 10:52:59 +1000
Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> wrote:
I think pretty much all *nix systems put core shells like sh, bash, zsh
etc in /bin (as it is guaranteed to be available immediately at boot, while /usr is
not - it could be a separate partition which isn't available until later
in the boot process).
They do but at least solaris circa v.9 and now redhat have replaced /bin with a symlink to /usr/bin. Whether you get /bin/sh or /usr/bin/sh out of `which` depends purely on their order in your $PATH.
A way to avoid platform differences is to use /usr/bin/env e.g.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
Except now you can't pass arguments to your bash.
You can't win. Although in the case of shell scripts you can get rid of all bash'isms and call '/bin/sh'
--
Dmitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@bmrb.wisc.edu>