Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

Started by Julie Nishimuraover 5 years ago3 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Julie Nishimura
juliezain@hotmail.com

Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward, we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

These are some snippets from master postgresql.conf file:

==================================
wal_level = hot_standby # minimal, archive, hot_standby, or logical
# (change requires restart)
checkpoint_segments = 16
wal_keep_segments = 512
max_wal_senders = 16 # max number of walsender processes
# (change requires restart)
max_replication_slots = 12 # max number of replication slots
===================================

Is it enough if I do the following:
1) backup all dbs on master
2) shutdown both servers
3) update max_replication_slots=0 in postgresql.conf on master
4) update wal_level = minimal in postgresql.conf on master
4) start master

Do I need to do anything else? Thank you for your help

#2David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: Julie Nishimura (#1)
Re: Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

On Tuesday, July 14, 2020, Julie Nishimura <juliezain@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward,
we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

If you are keeping the primary you shouldn’t have to do anything. The
absence of a secondary server shouldn’t impact the primary. You might be
recording more detail to WAL than strictly necessary but that isn’t wrong
outright.

David J.

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: David G. Johnston (#2)
Re: Convert hot_standby 9.4 postgresql into standalone server

"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, July 14, 2020, Julie Nishimura <juliezain@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hello, we currently have 9.4 hot_standby master-slave pair. Going forward,
we can keep only one server. How can I convert the system properly?

If you are keeping the primary you shouldn’t have to do anything. The
absence of a secondary server shouldn’t impact the primary. You might be
recording more detail to WAL than strictly necessary but that isn’t wrong
outright.

Yeah. What you *do* need to think about is, if you no longer have
a standby server, what's your disaster recovery plan in case the
primary fails? You need to have some good backup procedures in place.

regards, tom lane