Broken logical replication

Started by Игорь Выскоркоabout 4 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Игорь Выскорко
vyskorko.igor@yandex.ru

<div><div><div>Giving 2 postgres servers:</div><div>1. Master -  PostgreSQL 10.16</div><div>2. Slave - PostgreSQL 13.5</div><div> </div><div>Logical replication was configured and worked fine between them. </div><div>At some point software (russian accounting soft: 1C) which is using master DB, decided to do some db-related tasks. I know only about full reindexing - all indexes are built again - probably there were more DDL...</div><div>Ok, when it's finished I found that replication was broken:</div><div>1. Publication object exists but all publication tables were dropped. I mean not tables itself but: </div><div>select * from pg_publication_tables gave 0 rows. Ok, I've added them again - didn't help</div><div>2. In log I've found repeated bunch of records:</div><div>янв 20 23:33:29 testpg postgres[6291]: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:29.087 UTC [6291] ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984</div><div>янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.101 UTC [6295] LOG:  connection received: host=192.168.7.225 port=43428</div><div>янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]: [8-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.102 UTC [6295] LOG:  replication connection authorized: user=rep_user</div><div>янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.104 UTC [6295] ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC [6298] LOG:  connection received: host=192.168.7.225 port=43470</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [8-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.118 UTC [6298] LOG:  replication connection authorized: user=rep_user</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.537 UTC [6298] LOG:  starting logical decoding for slot "subscr"</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [9-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.537 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8</div><div>янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions.</div><div> </div><div>3. Replication status:</div><div>db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ;</div><div>-[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------</div><div>pid              | 6298</div><div>usesysid         | 16384</div><div>usename          | rep_user</div><div>application_name | subscr</div><div>client_addr      | 192.168.7.225</div><div>client_hostname  |</div><div>client_port      | 43470</div><div>backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00</div><div>backend_xmin     |</div><div>state            | catchup</div><div>sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8</div><div>write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020</div><div>flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020</div><div>replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020</div><div>write_lag        |</div><div>flush_lag        |</div><div>replay_lag       |</div><div>sync_priority    | 0</div><div>sync_state       | async</div><div> </div><div>sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?)</div><div> </div><div>4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. </div><div> </div><div>So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?</div></div></div>

#2Игорь Выскорко
vyskorko.igor@yandex.ru
In reply to: Игорь Выскорко (#1)
Re: Broken logical replication

Hi experts!
I didn't notice html tags in previous message. Sorry for that. Hope that
was the only reason of no answers :)

Original message was:
Giving 2 postgres servers:
1. Master -  PostgreSQL 10.16
2. Slave - PostgreSQL 13.5
Logical replication was configured and worked fine between them.
At some point software (russian accounting soft: 1C) which is using
master DB, decided to do some db-related tasks. I know only about full
reindexing - all indexes are built again - probably there were more DDL...
Ok, when it's finished I found that replication was broken:
1. Publication object exists but all publication tables were dropped. I
mean not tables itself but:
select * from pg_publication_tables gave 0 rows. Ok, I've added them
again - didn't help
2. In log I've found repeated bunch of records:
янв 20 23:33:29 testpg postgres[6291]ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.101 UTC: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:29.087 UTC
[6291]: ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.101 UTC
янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.101 UTC
[6295]: ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC
янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC: [8-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.102 UTC
[6295]: ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC
янв 20 23:33:34 testpg postgres[6295]ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:34.104 UTC
[6295]: ERROR:  replication slot "subscr" is active for PID 3984 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [7-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117 UTC
[6298]: DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [8-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.118 UTC
[6298]: DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [9-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.537 UTC
[6298]: DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [9-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.537 UTC
[6298]: DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?
reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538
UTC [6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)? LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8
янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538
UTC [6298]DETAIL:  streaming transactions committing after 1E0/3449C020, reading WAL from 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-1] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] LOG:  logical decoding found consistent point at 1D9/EEAD19E8 янв 20 23:33:39 testpg postgres[6298]: [10-2] 2022-01-20 16:33:39.538 UTC [6298] DETAIL:  There are no running transactions. 3. Replication status: db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ; -[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------ pid              | 6298 usesysid         | 16384 usename          | rep_user application_name | subscr client_addr      | 192.168.7.225 client_hostname  | client_port      | 43470 backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00 backend_xmin     | state            | catchup sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8 write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020 replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020 write_lag        | flush_lag        | replay_lag       | sync_priority    | 0 sync_state       | async sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?) 4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened replication slot. So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)? DETAIL:  There are no running transactions.
3. Replication status:
db=# select * from pg_stat_replication ;
-[ RECORD 1 ]----+------------------------------
pid              | 6298
usesysid         | 16384
usename          | rep_user
application_name | subscr
client_addr      | 192.168.7.225
client_hostname  |
client_port      | 43470
backend_start    | 2022-01-20 16:33:39.117019+00
backend_xmin     |
state            | catchup
sent_lsn         | 1DE/E849BFD8
write_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020
flush_lsn        | 1E0/3449C020
replay_lsn       | 1E0/3449C020
write_lag        |
flush_lag        |
replay_lag       |
sync_priority    | 0
sync_state       | async
sent_lsn is lower than write_lsn, what? Is it legal?)
4. pg_wal directory was bloated - it's ok I suppose because of opened
replication slot.
So, my question here: is it possible to fix replication without full
restart (truncating tables in slave and copy all data)?