REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY is blocking autovacuum on table

Started by Dirk Krautschick2 months ago3 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Dirk Krautschick
dee-kay@gmx.de

Hi,

I have a situation here where a frequent

REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY

is preventing autovacuum on some tables kind of running into a circle of
growing.

Why is this acutally blocking autovacuum and what is the best practice
to prevent
this excelt just not refreshing the materialized view frequently? :-)

Cheers

Dirk

#2Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
In reply to: Dirk Krautschick (#1)
Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY is blocking autovacuum on table

On 2/8/26 17:17, Dirk Krautschick wrote:

Hi,

I have a situation here where a frequent

REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY

is preventing autovacuum on some tables kind of running into a circle of
growing.

You will need to:

1) Show the original CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW command.

2) Indicate if the blocked autovacuum is on the tables the view is
pulling from or other tables.

3) Tell us the Postgres version and whether it is community version or a
fork.

Why is this acutally blocking autovacuum and what is the best practice
to prevent
this excelt just not refreshing the materialized view frequently? :-)

Cheers

Dirk

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

#3Laurenz Albe
laurenz.albe@cybertec.at
In reply to: Dirk Krautschick (#1)
Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY is blocking autovacuum on table

On Mon, 2026-02-09 at 02:17 +0100, Dirk Krautschick wrote:

I have a situation here where a frequent 

 REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY

is preventing autovacuum on some tables kind of running into a circle of growing.

I'm not sure I understand you correctly.

REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY will block VACUUM on the materialized
view, because the statements take conflicting locks.

But the statement won't block VACUUM on the underlying tables.
However, if REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY is running for a long time,
you will have a long-running transaction, and VACUUM won't be able to clean
up tuples that became dead later.

Why is this acutally blocking autovacuum and what is the best practice to prevent 
this excelt just not refreshing the materialized view frequently? :-)

I also have trouble understanding that sentence.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe