pgbouncer transaction pool mode issue for prepared statements

Started by Durgamahesh Manneabout 2 months ago4 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Durgamahesh Manne
maheshpostgres9@gmail.com

Hi PGDG Team

We’re currently facing an issue with PgBouncer transaction pooling mode,
where prepared statements are failing, and we are unable to modify the
application code to disable or change how prepared statements are used.

Switching to session pooling mode is not feasible for us because we have a
very high number of connections that we cannot fully control. Environment
details: PgBouncer version: 1.25.1 PostgreSQL version: 16.11

The specific error we’re seeing is:

bind message has 43 result formats but query has 47 columns

ERROR: unnamed prepared statement does not exist Repeatedly logs

Has anyone encountered this issue with transaction pooling and prepared
statements? Are there any PgBouncer parameters or settings we can use to
mitigate this problem without requiring application‑level changes? Any
guidance or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

Regards
Durga Mahesh

#2Adrien Obernesser (OBA)
adrien.obernesser@dbi-services.com
In reply to: Durgamahesh Manne (#1)
Re: pgbouncer transaction pool mode issue for prepared statements

Hi,

It looks like you have the issue of a query that is referencing the prepared statements of another session. This is expected in transaction pooling mode. Since you are using this version of pgbouncer
try to look into the max_prepared_statements parameter, I am not quite sure with the unnamed aspect though, this would need testing on your config.

Cordialement, Kind Regards,

Adrien OBERNESSER

________________________________
From: Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2026 2:24 PM
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: pgbouncer transaction pool mode issue for prepared statements

Hi PGDG Team

We’re currently facing an issue with PgBouncer transaction pooling mode, where prepared statements are failing, and we are unable to modify the application code to disable or change how prepared statements are used.

Switching to session pooling mode is not feasible for us because we have a very high number of connections that we cannot fully control. Environment details: PgBouncer version: 1.25.1 PostgreSQL version: 16.11

The specific error we’re seeing is:

bind message has 43 result formats but query has 47 columns

ERROR: unnamed prepared statement does not exist Repeatedly logs

Has anyone encountered this issue with transaction pooling and prepared statements? Are there any PgBouncer parameters or settings we can use to mitigate this problem without requiring application‑level changes? Any guidance or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

Regards
Durga Mahesh

#3Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
In reply to: Durgamahesh Manne (#1)
Re: pgbouncer transaction pool mode issue for prepared statements

On 2/16/26 05:24, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:

Hi PGDG Team

We’re currently facing an issue with PgBouncer transaction pooling mode,
where prepared statements are failing, and we are unable to modify the
application code to disable or change how prepared statements are used.

Switching to session pooling mode is not feasible for us because we have
a very high number of connections that we cannot fully control.
Environment details: PgBouncer version: 1.25.1 PostgreSQL version: 16.11

 The specific error we’re seeing is:

bind message has 43 result formats but query has 47 columns

ERROR: unnamed prepared statement does not exist Repeatedly logs

 Has anyone encountered this issue with transaction pooling and
prepared statements? Are there any PgBouncer parameters or settings we
can use to mitigate this problem without requiring application‑level
changes? Any guidance or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

A little exploration/searching would have revealed:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html

5), How to use prepared statements with transaction pooling?

Which leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html#how-to-use-prepared-statements-with-transaction-pooling

which in turn leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/config.html#max_prepared_statements

Note though the caveat in last link:

"Note: This tracking and rewriting of prepared statement commands does
not work for SQL-level prepared statement commands, so PREPARE, EXECUTE
and DEALLOCATE are forwarded straight to Postgres. The exception to this
rule are the DEALLOCATE ALL and DISCARD ALL commands, these do work as
expected and will clear the prepared statements that PgBouncer tracked
for the client that sends this command."

Regards
Durga Mahesh

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

#4Durgamahesh Manne
maheshpostgres9@gmail.com
In reply to: Adrian Klaver (#3)
Re: pgbouncer transaction pool mode issue for prepared statements

On Mon, 16 Feb, 2026, 21:35 Adrian Klaver, <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
wrote:

On 2/16/26 05:24, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:

Hi PGDG Team

We’re currently facing an issue with PgBouncer transaction pooling mode,
where prepared statements are failing, and we are unable to modify the
application code to disable or change how prepared statements are used.

Switching to session pooling mode is not feasible for us because we have
a very high number of connections that we cannot fully control.
Environment details: PgBouncer version: 1.25.1 PostgreSQL version: 16.11

The specific error we’re seeing is:

bind message has 43 result formats but query has 47 columns

ERROR: unnamed prepared statement does not exist Repeatedly logs

Has anyone encountered this issue with transaction pooling and
prepared statements? Are there any PgBouncer parameters or settings we
can use to mitigate this problem without requiring application‑level
changes? Any guidance or solutions would be greatly appreciated.

A little exploration/searching would have revealed:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html

5), How to use prepared statements with transaction pooling?

Which leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/faq.html#how-to-use-prepared-statements-with-transaction-pooling

which in turn leads to:

https://www.pgbouncer.org/config.html#max_prepared_statements

Note though the caveat in last link:

"Note: This tracking and rewriting of prepared statement commands does
not work for SQL-level prepared statement commands, so PREPARE, EXECUTE
and DEALLOCATE are forwarded straight to Postgres. The exception to this
rule are the DEALLOCATE ALL and DISCARD ALL commands, these do work as
expected and will clear the prepared statements that PgBouncer tracked
for the client that sends this command."

Regards
Durga Mahesh

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

Hi

Thank you so much for this information

Regards
Durga Mahesh

Show quoted text