libq API question

Started by Igor Korot24 days ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Igor Korot
ikorot01@gmail.com

Hi, ALL,

In the docs I see the following:

[quote]

PGresult *PQexecParams(PGconn *conn,
const char *command,
int nParams,
const Oid *paramTypes,
const char * const *paramValues,
const int *paramLengths,
const int *paramFormats,
int resultFormat);
[/quote]

Is there a reason why the parameters are int and not unsigned int?

There is no way the length can be negative...

Is it for backward compatibility?

Thank you.

#2David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: Igor Korot (#1)
Re: libq API question

On Thursday, March 12, 2026, Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, ALL,

In the docs I see the following:

[quote]

PGresult *PQexecParams(PGconn *conn,
const char *command,
int nParams,
const Oid *paramTypes,
const char * const *paramValues,
const int *paramLengths,
const int *paramFormats,
int resultFormat);
[/quote]

Is there a reason why the parameters are int and not unsigned int?

Unsigned ints are, I believe, less performant, and losing half the value
space is immaterial here.

David J.