libq API question
Hi, ALL,
In the docs I see the following:
[quote]
PGresult *PQexecParams(PGconn *conn,
const char *command,
int nParams,
const Oid *paramTypes,
const char * const *paramValues,
const int *paramLengths,
const int *paramFormats,
int resultFormat);
[/quote]
Is there a reason why the parameters are int and not unsigned int?
There is no way the length can be negative...
Is it for backward compatibility?
Thank you.
On Thursday, March 12, 2026, Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, ALL,
In the docs I see the following:
[quote]
PGresult *PQexecParams(PGconn *conn,
const char *command,
int nParams,
const Oid *paramTypes,
const char * const *paramValues,
const int *paramLengths,
const int *paramFormats,
int resultFormat);
[/quote]Is there a reason why the parameters are int and not unsigned int?
Unsigned ints are, I believe, less performant, and losing half the value
space is immaterial here.
David J.