RC5 Bundled ...
And available on the main FTP server ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
And available on the main FTP server ...
The latest bug report reminded me that our standard test suite doesn't
exercise pg_dump at all. Please do try to beat on RC5's pg_dump over
the next week and see if it does the right things.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
And available on the main FTP server ...
The latest bug report reminded me that our standard test suite doesn't
exercise pg_dump at all. Please do try to beat on RC5's pg_dump over
the next week and see if it does the right things.
The classic test is dump/reload/dump and compare the dumps. I wonder if
we could automate that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:25:54AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
The latest bug report reminded me that our standard test suite doesn't
exercise pg_dump at all. Please do try to beat on RC5's pg_dump over
the next week and see if it does the right things.The classic test is dump/reload/dump and compare the dumps. I wonder if
we could automate that.
That wouldn't have caught the index ownership bug. I just did a
test with the 8.0.0rc4 pg_dump and got identical output even though
the restored indexes had the wrong ownership. I don't oppose the
idea -- I'm just mentioning one case where it wouldn't have worked.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/