pgsql/src backend/catalog/index.c backend/pars ...
CVSROOT: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot
Module name: pgsql
Changes by: momjian@hub.org 01/05/18 18:35:51
Modified files:
src/backend/catalog: index.c
src/backend/parser: parse_expr.c parse_func.c
src/backend/utils/adt: format_type.c
src/include/parser: parse_func.h
Log message:
Rename ParseFuncOrColumn() to ParseColumnOrFunc().
Bruce Momjian - CVS <momjian@hub.org> writes:
Rename ParseFuncOrColumn() to ParseColumnOrFunc().
This is an improvement?
Considering that the function is primarily concerned with parsing
function calls, I'd call this a net decrease in intelligibility.
regards, tom lane
Bruce Momjian - CVS <momjian@hub.org> writes:
Rename ParseFuncOrColumn() to ParseColumnOrFunc().
This is an improvement?
Considering that the function is primarily concerned with parsing
function calls, I'd call this a net decrease in intelligibility.
Here is my comment added to the top of the code. Is it correct?
/*
* parse function
* This code is confusing code because the database can accept
* relation.column, column.function, or relation.column.function.
* It can also be called as func(col) or func(col,col).
*
* Funcname is the first parameter, and fargs are the rest.
*/
ParseColumnOrFunc(ParseState *pstate, char *funcname, List *fargs,
bool agg_star, bool agg_distinct,
int precedence)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
Here is my comment added to the top of the code. Is it correct?
* This code is confusing code because the database can accept
* relation.column, column.function, or relation.column.function.
* It can also be called as func(col) or func(col,col).
That's correct.
* Funcname is the first parameter, and fargs are the rest.
That's not, or at least it doesn't apply to the dot-notation cases.
func(col) and col.func are equivalent notations and look the same
by the time they get to this routine.
regards, tom lane
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
Here is my comment added to the top of the code. Is it correct?
* This code is confusing code because the database can accept
* relation.column, column.function, or relation.column.function.
* It can also be called as func(col) or func(col,col).That's correct.
* Funcname is the first parameter, and fargs are the rest.
That's not, or at least it doesn't apply to the dot-notation cases.
func(col) and col.func are equivalent notations and look the same
by the time they get to this routine.
Oh, got it. I will put the old name back and update the comment.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026