Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary
Folks,
We're thinking of throwing a little conference next July. However, we
need to know *this week*, an estimate of how many people would come to the
conference.
So, please fill out the survey at:
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/survey/
... as soon as you can. Thanks!
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Josh Berkus wrote:
So, please fill out the survey at:
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/survey/
... as soon as you can. Thanks!
What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains
instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I
guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It
seems much more coherent to me.
What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org
points to the old advocacy site ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 21:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
So, please fill out the survey at:
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/survey/
... as soon as you can. Thanks!What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains
instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I
guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It
seems much more coherent to me.
The original reason behind this site having a seperate domain was due
primarily to a legal focus. However it used to be that
foundation.postgresql.org used to point to it.
What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org
points to the old advocacy site ...
This is probably due to some changes to the apache configs that have been made
lately? It should really be fixed.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Alvaro,
What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains
instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I
guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It
seems much more coherent to me.
It's a temporary site, so the domain doesn't really matter.
--Josh
Josh Berkus wrote:
Alvaro,
What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains
instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I
guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It
seems much more coherent to me.It's a temporary site, so the domain doesn't really matter.
Ah, ok -- I thought I had missed the announcement of the PostgreSQL
Foundation but I guess not :-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We're thinking of throwing a little conference next July. However, we
need to know *this week*, an estimate of how many people would come to the
conference.
Was this posted on general? I would think you'd get a better response
over there (and/or hackers) than here on advocacy.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200512012245
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFDj8OEvJuQZxSWSsgRAoWGAJ9Ap2GKqOM0hI2lUhCbEY7HT/kwMQCgt9ht
pBreUcRmW+JP6M5brnIHMfk=
=Wmcs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:45:53AM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
Was this posted on general? I would think you'd get a better response
over there (and/or hackers) than here on advocacy.
I don't think it was, although I think Josh said he wanted to send it
to -hackers and PWN as well.
Josh?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:58, Robert Treat wrote:
What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org
points to the old advocacy site ...This is probably due to some changes to the apache configs that have been
made lately? It should really be fixed.
Marc/Dave, can one of you take a look at this? Seems it should be addressed.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Where is it supposed to point to?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:58, Robert Treat wrote:
What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org
points to the old advocacy site ...This is probably due to some changes to the apache configs that have been
made lately? It should really be fixed.Marc/Dave, can one of you take a look at this? Seems it should be addressed.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
I would guess either the foundation website or nowhere.
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 21:39, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Where is it supposed to point to?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:58, Robert Treat wrote:
What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org
points to the old advocacy site ...This is probably due to some changes to the apache configs that have
been made lately? It should really be fixed.Marc/Dave, can one of you take a look at this? Seems it should be
addressed.--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL