status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

Started by Hans-Jürgen Schönigover 20 years ago5 messageshackers

postgres@cybertec.at

over 20 years ago

i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
are there any plans to integrate this or are there still improvements
which have to be made?

many thanks,

hans-juergen schoenig

Tom Lane

tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

over 20 years ago

In reply to: Hans-Jürgen Schönig (#1)

Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:

i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
are there any plans to integrate this

I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
I am).

regards, tom lane

Hannu Krosing

hannu@tm.ee

over 20 years ago

In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)

Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:

i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
are there any plans to integrate this

I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
I am).

What could I do to increase your trust in it ?

Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
tests to check for it ?

I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
checking it.

--------------
Hannu

Hannu Krosing

hannu@tm.ee

over 20 years ago

In reply to: Hannu Krosing (#3)

Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 09:50, kirjutas Hannu Krosing:

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:

i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
are there any plans to integrate this

I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
I am).

What could I do to increase your trust in it ?

Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
tests to check for it ?

I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
checking it.

It was pointed out to me that I did'nt.

So here it is:

---------------
Hannu

Bruce Momjian

bruce@momjian.us

over 20 years ago

In reply to: Hannu Krosing (#4)

Re: [HACKERS] status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

We seem to be stuck on this patch. Hannu wrote it, Tom doesn't trust
it, and no one else is commenting.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hannu Krosing wrote:

?hel kenal p?eval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 09:50, kirjutas Hannu Krosing:

?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:

i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
are there any plans to integrate this

I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
I am).

What could I do to increase your trust in it ?

Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
tests to check for it ?

I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
checking it.

It was pointed out to me that I did'nt.

So here it is:

---------------
Hannu

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

Attachments: