what is the smallest working page size for postgresql

Started by Hannu Krosingabout 20 years ago2 messages
#1Hannu Krosing
hannu@skype.net

Hi

Could anybody tell me what is the smallest working page size for
postgresql ?

I have a table where access is highly random over huge table getting
usually only one small tuple from each page. One way to get more
performance could be using smaller page size, so the per-tuple read
overhead would be smaller.

Would 4k pages work ? what about 2k and 1k ? 512bytes ?

What would it take, to make only heap pages small and keep index pages
larger ? Probably at least per-tablespace or per-pagesize split shared
buffer space and changes in caching algorithms ?

Has anyone tested if 8k is big enough to trigger (in my case
unneccesary) read-ahead on disks/controllers/devices/filesystem ?

---------------
Hannu

#2Qingqing Zhou
zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu
In reply to: Hannu Krosing (#1)
Re: what is the smallest working page size for postgresql

"Hannu Krosing" <hannu@skype.net> wrote

Could anybody tell me what is the smallest working page size for
postgresql ?

I have a table where access is highly random over huge table getting
usually only one small tuple from each page. One way to get more
performance could be using smaller page size, so the per-tuple read
overhead would be smaller.

Would 4k pages work ? what about 2k and 1k ? 512bytes ?

What would it take, to make only heap pages small and keep index pages
larger ? Probably at least per-tablespace or per-pagesize split shared
buffer space and changes in caching algorithms ?

I recall there was a discussion several weeks ago:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-12/msg00120.php

I bet block size less than 512 won't bring you any benefits, since that's
the physical disk sector size limit.

Regards,
Qingqing