BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

"Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman@pervasive.com> writes:

I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

regards, tom lane

Tom Lane wrote:

"Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman@pervasive.com> writes:

I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Not particularly, as I want it to do other things. However, I might be
willing
To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.

What were you thinking?

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US

"Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

What were you thinking?

[ shrug... ] Anything you don't see paired with amd64 on the buildfarm
roster is OK by me ...

regards, tom lane

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

"Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman@pervasive.com> writes:

I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Out of curiosity, is there any benefit to improving SMP versus
single-proc coverage?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, l...@lerctr.org ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

"Larry Rosenman" <lrosen...@pervasive.com> writes:

I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Not particularly, as I want it to do other things. However, I might be
willing
To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.

What were you thinking?

FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.

I can set up build farm on it if yall need it. Its running 6.2/amd64

------- Original Message -------
From: "Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>
To: " Larry Rosenman " <ler@lerctr.org>
Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, l...@lerctr.org ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

"Larry Rosenman" <lrosen...@pervasive.com> writes:

I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready. Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Not particularly, as I want it to do other things. However, I might be
willing
To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.

What were you thinking?

FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.