Copyright

Started by Joshua D. Drakealmost 20 years ago8 messages
#1Joshua D. Drake
jd@commandprompt.com

I have been noticing that the copyright is wrong on many files (2005)...
Do we have a utility to update the copyright?

J

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Joshua D. Drake (#1)
Re: Copyright

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:

I have been noticing that the copyright is wrong on many files (2005)...
Do we have a utility to update the copyright?

We update those strings at major releases.

regards, tom lane

#3Noname
mark@mark.mielke.cc
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: Copyright

Sorry... deleted the post I am responding to too quickly...

The question was whether there was a program to bring the files up to date.

Why? The code was written, and copyrighted, at the time that it was
submitted. Unless the code has been completely re-written, the original
copyright date applies.

After all - you wouldn't want somebody to say that PostgreSQL copied
them, because the date was later, would you? :-)

Cheers,
mark

--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...

http://mark.mielke.cc/

#4Matteo Beccati
php@beccati.com
In reply to: Noname (#3)
Re: Copyright

Mark,

After all - you wouldn't want somebody to say that PostgreSQL copied
them, because the date was later, would you? :-)

I think it won't be hard to understand what "Copyright (c) 1996-2006"
means ;)

Best regards
--
Matteo Beccati
http://phpadsnew.com
http://phppgads.com

#5Noname
mark@mark.mielke.cc
In reply to: Matteo Beccati (#4)
Re: Copyright

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Matteo Beccati wrote:

After all - you wouldn't want somebody to say that PostgreSQL copied
them, because the date was later, would you? :-)

I think it won't be hard to understand what "Copyright (c) 1996-2006"
means ;)

Maybe... but if it hasn't changed...

Of course, that whole line has no legal value in North America anyways...

Cheers,
mark

--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...

http://mark.mielke.cc/

#6Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Noname (#5)
Re: Copyright

mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote:

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Matteo Beccati wrote:

After all - you wouldn't want somebody to say that PostgreSQL copied
them, because the date was later, would you? :-)

I think it won't be hard to understand what "Copyright (c) 1996-2006"
means ;)

Maybe... but if it hasn't changed...

Of course, that whole line has no legal value in North America anyways...

The file is /src/tools/copyright. We don't re-run it for minor releases
because there are almost no changes in minor releases. If we did run
it, it would change a lot of code for little purpose.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#7Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#6)
Re: Copyright

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

The file is /src/tools/copyright. We don't re-run it for minor releases
because there are almost no changes in minor releases. If we did run
it, it would change a lot of code for little purpose.

It might make sense to run it once a year in early January, rather than
tying the update to releases.  In any case we'd only run it on CVS HEAD
--- I agree that updating the notices in the back branches would just
cause code churn.

regards, tom lane

#8Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#7)
Re: Copyright

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

The file is /src/tools/copyright. We don't re-run it for minor releases
because there are almost no changes in minor releases. If we did run
it, it would change a lot of code for little purpose.

It might make sense to run it once a year in early January, rather than
tying the update to releases.  In any case we'd only run it on CVS HEAD
--- I agree that updating the notices in the back branches would just
cause code churn.

Right. I usually do run it earlier in the year, but was delayed this
time.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +