buildfarm stats

Started by Andrew Dunstanover 19 years ago7 messages
#1Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net

Sometime in late June the buildfarm passed 50,000 builds reported on.
Here are stats over the lifetime.

cheers

andrew

ym | builds | reporting_members

--------+--------+-------------------
2004-10 | 181 | 6
2004-11 | 1533 | 12
2004-12 | 2468 | 27
2005-01 | 2432 | 30
2005-02 | 1367 | 25
2005-03 | 1970 | 28
2005-04 | 2297 | 28
2005-05 | 2348 | 28
2005-06 | 2543 | 34
2005-07 | 3038 | 43
2005-08 | 2748 | 41
2005-09 | 2104 | 36
2005-10 | 2597 | 36
2005-11 | 2214 | 35
2005-12 | 2534 | 38
2006-01 | 3338 | 41
2006-02 | 2843 | 40
2006-03 | 2536 | 43
2006-04 | 2978 | 45
2006-05 | 2816 | 45
2006-06 | 3338 | 50

#2Dave Page
dpage@vale-housing.co.uk
In reply to: Andrew Dunstan (#1)
Re: buildfarm stats

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew Dunstan
Sent: 03 July 2006 23:56
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: [HACKERS] buildfarm stats

Sometime in late June the buildfarm passed 50,000 builds reported on.
Here are stats over the lifetime.

Thanks for the stats Andrew. Out of interest, can you easily tabulate
the number of failures against OS?

Regards, Dave.

#3Chris Mair
list@1006.org
In reply to: Dave Page (#2)
Re: buildfarm stats

Thanks for the stats Andrew. Out of interest, can you easily tabulate
the number of failures against OS?

Or, more generally, even put a dump of the DB (without personal infos
of course :) somewhere?

Bye, Chris.

PS: and don't say you're running it in MySQL ;)

#4Joshua D. Drake
jd@commandprompt.com
In reply to: Chris Mair (#3)
Re: buildfarm stats

On Tuesday 04 July 2006 22:14, Chris Mair wrote:

Thanks for the stats Andrew. Out of interest, can you easily tabulate
the number of failures against OS?

Or, more generally, even put a dump of the DB (without personal infos
of course :) somewhere?

Bye, Chris.

PS: and don't say you're running it in MySQL ;)

Well as the host, I guarantee you that it is NOT running mySQL :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

Show quoted text

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

#5Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net
In reply to: Joshua D. Drake (#4)
Re: buildfarm stats

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

On Tuesday 04 July 2006 22:14, Chris Mair wrote:

Thanks for the stats Andrew. Out of interest, can you easily tabulate
the number of failures against OS?

Or, more generally, even put a dump of the DB (without personal infos
of course :) somewhere?

Bye, Chris.

PS: and don't say you're running it in MySQL ;)

Well as the host, I guarantee you that it is NOT running mySQL :)

but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal
data somewhere isn't really an option.

I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in these 2 tables:

system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler |
compiler_version | architecture >
build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >

(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage
that failed otherwise).

But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?

cheers

andrew

#6Chris Mair
list@1006.org
In reply to: Andrew Dunstan (#5)
Re: buildfarm stats

but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal
data somewhere isn't really an option.

I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in these 2 tables:

system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler |
compiler_version | architecture >
build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >

(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage
that failed otherwise).

But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?

Nothing important at all.
I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...

But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
mailing list syndrome ;)

Bye,
Chris.

#7Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net
In reply to: Chris Mair (#6)
Re: buildfarm stats

Chris Mair wrote:

but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal
data somewhere isn't really an option.

I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in these 2 tables:

system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler |
compiler_version | architecture >
build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >

(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage
that failed otherwise).

But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?

Nothing important at all.
I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...

But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
mailing list syndrome ;)

We don't have any timing info.

For now this goes on the wishlist.

cheers

andrew