pgsql: Done: o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Log Message:
-----------
Done:
o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc:
TODO (r1.1914 -> r1.1915)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.1914&r2=1.1915)
pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
TODO.html (r1.417 -> r1.418)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html.diff?r1=1.417&r2=1.418)
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Done:o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN parameter?
Right now, it stays silent.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Done:o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN parameter?
Right now, it stays silent.
[ Moved to hackers.] No idea. Comments?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Done:o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN parameter?
Right now, it stays silent.[ Moved to hackers.] No idea. Comments?
Actually, I'd be inclined to put IN if there are INOUT or OUT
parameters, and nothing if they are all IN parameters, but I realise
this might seem inconsistent.
cheers
andrew
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 06:07:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Done:o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN
parameter? Right now, it stays silent.[ Moved to hackers.] No idea. Comments?
I'm thinking "no." Parameters by default are unnamed IN parameters,
so I exposed and marked things which differed from that. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 06:07:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Moved to hackers.] No idea. Comments?
I'm thinking "no." Parameters by default are unnamed IN parameters,
so I exposed and marked things which differed from that. :)
I agree; the patch already makes \df more noisy than some would wish.
regards, tom lane