pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Started by Tom Laneover 19 years ago4 messageshackers
Jump to latest
#1Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

Log Message:
-----------
Stamp 7.3.16.

Tags:
----
REL7_3_STABLE

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql:
configure.in (r1.217.2.24 -> r1.217.2.25)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure.in.diff?r1=1.217.2.24&r2=1.217.2.25)
configure (r1.226.2.26 -> r1.226.2.27)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure.diff?r1=1.226.2.26&r2=1.226.2.27)

#2Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#1)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Tom Lane wrote:

Log Message:
-----------
Stamp 7.3.16.

Tags:
----
REL7_3_STABLE

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql:
configure.in (r1.217.2.24 -> r1.217.2.25)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure.in.diff?r1=1.217.2.24&r2=1.217.2.25)
configure (r1.226.2.26 -> r1.226.2.27)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure.diff?r1=1.226.2.26&r2=1.226.2.27)

Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
skipping it.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

Stamp 7.3.16.

Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
skipping it.

I've done it the last few times for back-branch releases --- I was under
the impression that Marc didn't have an installed copy anymore of the
old autoconf required to do it correctly for pre-8.1 branches.

regards, tom lane

#4Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

Stamp 7.3.16.

Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
skipping it.

I've done it the last few times for back-branch releases --- I was under
the impression that Marc didn't have an installed copy anymore of the
old autoconf required to do it correctly for pre-8.1 branches.

Perhaps. I only remember the discussion that I wasn't supposed to do it
as part of my general stamping. Perhaps the idea was that it should be
done on the day it is packaged, while I usually stamp several days
before that.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +