pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

Started by Tom Lanealmost 16 years ago4 messagescomitters
Jump to latest
#1Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

Log Message:
-----------
Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc/src/sgml:
btree-gist.sgml (r1.6 -> r1.7)
(http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/btree-gist.sgml?r1=1.6&r2=1.7)

#2Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#1)
Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:

Log Message:
-----------
Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Woops, sorry. Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Robert Haas (#2)
Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:

Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Woops, sorry. Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.

It appears that it would've built anyway in some contexts (the build at
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
wasn't complaining for instance). I only noticed it because I saw a
failure while doing a VPATH build. I'm still trying to figure out why
that matters ...

regards, tom lane

#4Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: pgsql: Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:

Fix markup, other minor editing for recent btree_gist doc changes.

Woops, sorry.  Didn't proofread that one as carefully as I should have.

It appears that it would've built anyway in some contexts (the build at
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
wasn't complaining for instance).  I only noticed it because I saw a
failure while doing a VPATH build.  I'm still trying to figure out why
that matters ...

It did work here for me (I just double checked, and it worked again),
but I still should have caught it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company