pgsql: Improve user-defined-aggregates documentation.
Improve user-defined-aggregates documentation.
On closer inspection, that two-element initcond value seems to have been
a little white lie to avoid explaining the full behavior of float8_accum.
But if people are going to expect the examples to be exactly correct,
I suppose we'd better explain. Per comment from Thom Brown.
Branch
------
REL9_0_STABLE
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03c77337209f0b2b3059d6ee9df2f94c6f66d910
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/xaggr.sgml | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On 23 March 2011 20:58, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Improve user-defined-aggregates documentation.
On closer inspection, that two-element initcond value seems to have been
a little white lie to avoid explaining the full behavior of float8_accum.
But if people are going to expect the examples to be exactly correct,
I suppose we'd better explain. Per comment from Thom Brown.Branch
------
REL9_0_STABLEDetails
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03c77337209f0b2b3059d6ee9df2f94c6f66d910Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/xaggr.sgml | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks Mr Lane :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company